Choosing Better NLDR Layouts by Evaluating the Model in the High-dimensional Data Space
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866918219087872000 |
|---|---|
| author | Gamage, Jayani P. Cook, Dianne Harrison, Paul Lydeamore, Michael Talagala, Thiyanga S. |
| author_facet | Gamage, Jayani P. Cook, Dianne Harrison, Paul Lydeamore, Michael Talagala, Thiyanga S. |
| contents | Nonlinear dimension reduction (NLDR) techniques such as tSNE, and UMAP provide a low-dimensional representation of high-dimensional data ($p\text{-}D$) by applying a nonlinear transformation. NLDR often exaggerates random patterns. But NLDR views have an important role in data analysis because, if done well, they provide a concise visual (and conceptual) summary of $p\text{-}D$ distributions. The NLDR methods and hyper-parameter choices can create wildly different representations, making it difficult to decide which is best, or whether any or all are accurate or misleading. To help assess the NLDR and decide on which, if any, is the most reasonable representation of the structure(s) present in the $p\text{-}D$ data, we have developed an algorithm to show the $2\text{-}D$ NLDR model in the $p\text{-}D$ space, viewed with a tour, a movie of linear projections. From this, one can see if the model fits everywhere, or better in some subspaces, or completely mismatches the data. Also, we can see how different methods may have similar summaries or quirks. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_22051 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Choosing Better NLDR Layouts by Evaluating the Model in the High-dimensional Data Space Gamage, Jayani P. Cook, Dianne Harrison, Paul Lydeamore, Michael Talagala, Thiyanga S. Methodology Nonlinear dimension reduction (NLDR) techniques such as tSNE, and UMAP provide a low-dimensional representation of high-dimensional data ($p\text{-}D$) by applying a nonlinear transformation. NLDR often exaggerates random patterns. But NLDR views have an important role in data analysis because, if done well, they provide a concise visual (and conceptual) summary of $p\text{-}D$ distributions. The NLDR methods and hyper-parameter choices can create wildly different representations, making it difficult to decide which is best, or whether any or all are accurate or misleading. To help assess the NLDR and decide on which, if any, is the most reasonable representation of the structure(s) present in the $p\text{-}D$ data, we have developed an algorithm to show the $2\text{-}D$ NLDR model in the $p\text{-}D$ space, viewed with a tour, a movie of linear projections. From this, one can see if the model fits everywhere, or better in some subspaces, or completely mismatches the data. Also, we can see how different methods may have similar summaries or quirks. |
| title | Choosing Better NLDR Layouts by Evaluating the Model in the High-dimensional Data Space |
| topic | Methodology |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22051 |