Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22497 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866911027103268864 |
|---|---|
| author | Wright, Craig Steven |
| author_facet | Wright, Craig Steven |
| contents | This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. This model empowers fields from computational science to the humanities, reframing academic knowledge as a living process rather than a static credential. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_22497 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship Wright, Craig Steven Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Digital Libraries Social and Information Networks History and Philosophy of Physics 68T99, 03B30, 91D30 I.2.0; H.3.5; K.4.4 This paper reconceptualises peer review as structured public commentary. Traditional academic validation is hindered by anonymity, latency, and gatekeeping. We propose a transparent, identity-linked, and reproducible system of scholarly evaluation anchored in open commentary. Leveraging blockchain for immutable audit trails and AI for iterative synthesis, we design a framework that incentivises intellectual contribution, captures epistemic evolution, and enables traceable reputational dynamics. This model empowers fields from computational science to the humanities, reframing academic knowledge as a living process rather than a static credential. |
| title | Peer Review as Structured Commentary: Immutable Identity, Public Dialogue, and Reproducible Scholarship |
| topic | Computers and Society Artificial Intelligence Digital Libraries Social and Information Networks History and Philosophy of Physics 68T99, 03B30, 91D30 I.2.0; H.3.5; K.4.4 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22497 |