Evaluating Hybrid Retrieval Augmented Generation using Dynamic Test Sets: LiveRAG Challenge
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915363824861184 |
|---|---|
| author | Fensore, Chase Dhole, Kaustubh Ho, Joyce C Agichtein, Eugene |
| author_facet | Fensore, Chase Dhole, Kaustubh Ho, Joyce C Agichtein, Eugene |
| contents | We present our submission to the LiveRAG Challenge 2025, which evaluates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems on dynamic test sets using the FineWeb-10BT corpus. Our final hybrid approach combines sparse (BM25) and dense (E5) retrieval methods and then aims to generate relevant and faithful answers with Falcon3-10B-Instruct. Through systematic evaluation on 200 synthetic questions generated with DataMorgana across 64 unique question-user combinations, we demonstrate that neural re-ranking with RankLLaMA improves MAP from 0.523 to 0.797 (52% relative improvement) but introduces prohibitive computational costs (84s vs 1.74s per question). While DSPy-optimized prompting strategies achieved higher semantic similarity (0.771 vs 0.668), their 0% refusal rates raised concerns about over-confidence and generalizability. Our submitted hybrid system without re-ranking achieved 4th place in faithfulness and 11th place in correctness among 25 teams. Analysis across question categories reveals that vocabulary alignment between questions and documents was the strongest predictor of performance on our development set, with document-similar phrasing improving cosine similarity from 0.562 to 0.762. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2506_22644 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Evaluating Hybrid Retrieval Augmented Generation using Dynamic Test Sets: LiveRAG Challenge Fensore, Chase Dhole, Kaustubh Ho, Joyce C Agichtein, Eugene Computation and Language Information Retrieval We present our submission to the LiveRAG Challenge 2025, which evaluates retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems on dynamic test sets using the FineWeb-10BT corpus. Our final hybrid approach combines sparse (BM25) and dense (E5) retrieval methods and then aims to generate relevant and faithful answers with Falcon3-10B-Instruct. Through systematic evaluation on 200 synthetic questions generated with DataMorgana across 64 unique question-user combinations, we demonstrate that neural re-ranking with RankLLaMA improves MAP from 0.523 to 0.797 (52% relative improvement) but introduces prohibitive computational costs (84s vs 1.74s per question). While DSPy-optimized prompting strategies achieved higher semantic similarity (0.771 vs 0.668), their 0% refusal rates raised concerns about over-confidence and generalizability. Our submitted hybrid system without re-ranking achieved 4th place in faithfulness and 11th place in correctness among 25 teams. Analysis across question categories reveals that vocabulary alignment between questions and documents was the strongest predictor of performance on our development set, with document-similar phrasing improving cosine similarity from 0.562 to 0.762. |
| title | Evaluating Hybrid Retrieval Augmented Generation using Dynamic Test Sets: LiveRAG Challenge |
| topic | Computation and Language Information Retrieval |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.22644 |