Can Large Language Models Develop Strategic Reasoning? Post-training Insights from Learning Chess

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Hwang, Dongyoon, Lee, Hojoon, Choo, Jaegul, Park, Dongmin, Park, Jongho
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866911126504079360
author Hwang, Dongyoon
Lee, Hojoon
Choo, Jaegul
Park, Dongmin
Park, Jongho
author_facet Hwang, Dongyoon
Lee, Hojoon
Choo, Jaegul
Park, Dongmin
Park, Jongho
contents While reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) has shown promise in mathematical reasoning, strategic reasoning for LLMs using RL remains largely unexplored. We investigate whether LLMs can develop strategic reasoning capabilities through RL in chess. To this end, we leverage a chess-pretrained action-value network to provide dense reward on the LLM's output move quality, which can be seen as a form of knowledge distillation. Our experiments show that our distillation-based dense rewards often outperform sparse binary rewards. However, surprisingly, all models plateau far below expert levels. We provide SFT and RL ablations on chess reasoning training and find evidence that this limitation stems from a deficit in the pretrained models' internal understanding of chess-a deficit which RL alone may not be able to fully overcome. The code is available at https://github.com/krafton-ai/Chess-R1.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_00726
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Can Large Language Models Develop Strategic Reasoning? Post-training Insights from Learning Chess
Hwang, Dongyoon
Lee, Hojoon
Choo, Jaegul
Park, Dongmin
Park, Jongho
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
While reinforcement learning (RL) for large language models (LLMs) has shown promise in mathematical reasoning, strategic reasoning for LLMs using RL remains largely unexplored. We investigate whether LLMs can develop strategic reasoning capabilities through RL in chess. To this end, we leverage a chess-pretrained action-value network to provide dense reward on the LLM's output move quality, which can be seen as a form of knowledge distillation. Our experiments show that our distillation-based dense rewards often outperform sparse binary rewards. However, surprisingly, all models plateau far below expert levels. We provide SFT and RL ablations on chess reasoning training and find evidence that this limitation stems from a deficit in the pretrained models' internal understanding of chess-a deficit which RL alone may not be able to fully overcome. The code is available at https://github.com/krafton-ai/Chess-R1.
title Can Large Language Models Develop Strategic Reasoning? Post-training Insights from Learning Chess
topic Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.00726