Convergence and Sample Complexity of First-Order Methods for Agnostic Reinforcement Learning

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sherman, Uri, Koren, Tomer, Mansour, Yishay
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912468592230400
author Sherman, Uri
Koren, Tomer
Mansour, Yishay
author_facet Sherman, Uri
Koren, Tomer
Mansour, Yishay
contents We study reinforcement learning (RL) in the agnostic policy learning setting, where the goal is to find a policy whose performance is competitive with the best policy in a given class of interest $Π$ -- crucially, without assuming that $Π$ contains the optimal policy. We propose a general policy learning framework that reduces this problem to first-order optimization in a non-Euclidean space, leading to new algorithms as well as shedding light on the convergence properties of existing ones. Specifically, under the assumption that $Π$ is convex and satisfies a variational gradient dominance (VGD) condition -- an assumption known to be strictly weaker than more standard completeness and coverability conditions -- we obtain sample complexity upper bounds for three policy learning algorithms: \emph{(i)} Steepest Descent Policy Optimization, derived from a constrained steepest descent method for non-convex optimization; \emph{(ii)} the classical Conservative Policy Iteration algorithm \citep{kakade2002approximately} reinterpreted through the lens of the Frank-Wolfe method, which leads to improved convergence results; and \emph{(iii)} an on-policy instantiation of the well-studied Policy Mirror Descent algorithm. Finally, we empirically evaluate the VGD condition across several standard environments, demonstrating the practical relevance of our key assumption.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_04406
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Convergence and Sample Complexity of First-Order Methods for Agnostic Reinforcement Learning
Sherman, Uri
Koren, Tomer
Mansour, Yishay
Machine Learning
Optimization and Control
We study reinforcement learning (RL) in the agnostic policy learning setting, where the goal is to find a policy whose performance is competitive with the best policy in a given class of interest $Π$ -- crucially, without assuming that $Π$ contains the optimal policy. We propose a general policy learning framework that reduces this problem to first-order optimization in a non-Euclidean space, leading to new algorithms as well as shedding light on the convergence properties of existing ones. Specifically, under the assumption that $Π$ is convex and satisfies a variational gradient dominance (VGD) condition -- an assumption known to be strictly weaker than more standard completeness and coverability conditions -- we obtain sample complexity upper bounds for three policy learning algorithms: \emph{(i)} Steepest Descent Policy Optimization, derived from a constrained steepest descent method for non-convex optimization; \emph{(ii)} the classical Conservative Policy Iteration algorithm \citep{kakade2002approximately} reinterpreted through the lens of the Frank-Wolfe method, which leads to improved convergence results; and \emph{(iii)} an on-policy instantiation of the well-studied Policy Mirror Descent algorithm. Finally, we empirically evaluate the VGD condition across several standard environments, demonstrating the practical relevance of our key assumption.
title Convergence and Sample Complexity of First-Order Methods for Agnostic Reinforcement Learning
topic Machine Learning
Optimization and Control
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.04406