Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kryś, Jakub, Sharma, Yashvardhan, Egan, Janet
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07765
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866913936334389248
author Kryś, Jakub
Sharma, Yashvardhan
Egan, Janet
author_facet Kryś, Jakub
Sharma, Yashvardhan
Egan, Janet
contents Advances in low-communication training algorithms are enabling a shift from centralised model training to compute setups that are either distributed across multiple clusters or decentralised via community-driven contributions. This paper distinguishes these two scenarios - distributed and decentralised training - which are little understood and often conflated in policy discourse. We discuss how they could impact technical AI governance through an increased risk of compute structuring, capability proliferation, and the erosion of detectability and shutdownability. While these trends foreshadow a possible new paradigm that could challenge key assumptions of compute governance, we emphasise that certain policy levers, like export controls, remain relevant. We also acknowledge potential benefits of decentralised AI, including privacy-preserving training runs that could unlock access to more data, and mitigating harmful power concentration. Our goal is to support more precise policymaking around compute, capability proliferation, and decentralised AI development.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_07765
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Distributed and Decentralised Training: Technical Governance Challenges in a Shifting AI Landscape
Kryś, Jakub
Sharma, Yashvardhan
Egan, Janet
Computers and Society
Machine Learning
Advances in low-communication training algorithms are enabling a shift from centralised model training to compute setups that are either distributed across multiple clusters or decentralised via community-driven contributions. This paper distinguishes these two scenarios - distributed and decentralised training - which are little understood and often conflated in policy discourse. We discuss how they could impact technical AI governance through an increased risk of compute structuring, capability proliferation, and the erosion of detectability and shutdownability. While these trends foreshadow a possible new paradigm that could challenge key assumptions of compute governance, we emphasise that certain policy levers, like export controls, remain relevant. We also acknowledge potential benefits of decentralised AI, including privacy-preserving training runs that could unlock access to more data, and mitigating harmful power concentration. Our goal is to support more precise policymaking around compute, capability proliferation, and decentralised AI development.
title Distributed and Decentralised Training: Technical Governance Challenges in a Shifting AI Landscape
topic Computers and Society
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.07765