Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Harries, Ryan, Lawson, Cornelia, Shapira, Philip
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08310
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866916838557876224
author Harries, Ryan
Lawson, Cornelia
Shapira, Philip
author_facet Harries, Ryan
Lawson, Cornelia
Shapira, Philip
contents This paper examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on scientific practices, conducting a qualitative review of selected literature to explore its applications, benefits, and challenges. The review draws on the OpenAlex publication database, using a Boolean search approach to identify scientific literature related to GenAI (including large language models and ChatGPT). Thirty-nine highly cited papers and commentaries are reviewed and qualitatively coded. Results are categorized by GenAI applications in science, scientific writing, medical practice, and education and training. The analysis finds that while there is a rapid adoption of GenAI in science and science practice, its long-term implications remain unclear, with ongoing uncertainties about its use and governance. The study provides early insights into GenAI's growing role in science and identifies questions for future research in this evolving field.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_08310
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Generative AI in Science: Applications, Challenges, and Emerging Questions
Harries, Ryan
Lawson, Cornelia
Shapira, Philip
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
K.4; I.2
This paper examines the impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on scientific practices, conducting a qualitative review of selected literature to explore its applications, benefits, and challenges. The review draws on the OpenAlex publication database, using a Boolean search approach to identify scientific literature related to GenAI (including large language models and ChatGPT). Thirty-nine highly cited papers and commentaries are reviewed and qualitatively coded. Results are categorized by GenAI applications in science, scientific writing, medical practice, and education and training. The analysis finds that while there is a rapid adoption of GenAI in science and science practice, its long-term implications remain unclear, with ongoing uncertainties about its use and governance. The study provides early insights into GenAI's growing role in science and identifies questions for future research in this evolving field.
title Generative AI in Science: Applications, Challenges, and Emerging Questions
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
K.4; I.2
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08310