Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu, Zishan, Xie, Shuyi, Lv, Qingsong, Xiao, Shupei, Song, Linlin, Wenjuan, Sui, Lin, Fan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08459
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866911050784309248
author Xu, Zishan
Xie, Shuyi
Lv, Qingsong
Xiao, Shupei
Song, Linlin
Wenjuan, Sui
Lin, Fan
author_facet Xu, Zishan
Xie, Shuyi
Lv, Qingsong
Xiao, Shupei
Song, Linlin
Wenjuan, Sui
Lin, Fan
contents With the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various tasks, the mainstream LLM platforms generate massive user-model interactions daily. In order to efficiently analyze the performance of models and diagnose failures in their answers, it is essential to develop an automated framework to systematically categorize and attribute errors. However, existing evaluation models lack error attribution capability. In this work, we establish a comprehensive Misattribution Framework with 6 primary and 15 secondary categories to facilitate in-depth analysis. Based on this framework, we present AttriData, a dataset specifically designed for error attribution, encompassing misattribution, along with the corresponding scores and feedback. We also propose MisAttributionLLM, a fine-tuned model on AttriData, which is the first general-purpose judge model capable of simultaneously generating score, misattribution, and feedback. Extensive experiments and analyses are conducted to confirm the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed method.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_08459
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Diagnosing Failures in Large Language Models' Answers: Integrating Error Attribution into Evaluation Framework
Xu, Zishan
Xie, Shuyi
Lv, Qingsong
Xiao, Shupei
Song, Linlin
Wenjuan, Sui
Lin, Fan
Computation and Language
With the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in various tasks, the mainstream LLM platforms generate massive user-model interactions daily. In order to efficiently analyze the performance of models and diagnose failures in their answers, it is essential to develop an automated framework to systematically categorize and attribute errors. However, existing evaluation models lack error attribution capability. In this work, we establish a comprehensive Misattribution Framework with 6 primary and 15 secondary categories to facilitate in-depth analysis. Based on this framework, we present AttriData, a dataset specifically designed for error attribution, encompassing misattribution, along with the corresponding scores and feedback. We also propose MisAttributionLLM, a fine-tuned model on AttriData, which is the first general-purpose judge model capable of simultaneously generating score, misattribution, and feedback. Extensive experiments and analyses are conducted to confirm the effectiveness and robustness of our proposed method.
title Diagnosing Failures in Large Language Models' Answers: Integrating Error Attribution into Evaluation Framework
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.08459