Explainability as a Compliance Requirement: What Regulated Industries Need from AI Tools for Design Artifact Generation
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autores principales: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866916840491450368 |
|---|---|
| author | Shah, Syed Tauhid Ullah Hussein, Mohammad Barcomb, Ann Moshirpour, Mohammad |
| author_facet | Shah, Syed Tauhid Ullah Hussein, Mohammad Barcomb, Ann Moshirpour, Mohammad |
| contents | Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for automating design artifact generation are increasingly used in Requirements Engineering (RE) to transform textual requirements into structured diagrams and models. While these AI tools, particularly those based on Natural Language Processing (NLP), promise to improve efficiency, their adoption remains limited in regulated industries where transparency and traceability are essential. In this paper, we investigate the explainability gap in AI-driven design artifact generation through semi-structured interviews with ten practitioners from safety-critical industries. We examine how current AI-based tools are integrated into workflows and the challenges arising from their lack of explainability. We also explore mitigation strategies, their impact on project outcomes, and features needed to improve usability. Our findings reveal that non-explainable AI outputs necessitate extensive manual validation, reduce stakeholder trust, struggle to handle domain-specific terminology, disrupt team collaboration, and introduce regulatory compliance risks, often negating the anticipated efficiency benefits. To address these issues, we identify key improvements, including source tracing, providing clear justifications for tool-generated decisions, supporting domain-specific adaptation, and enabling compliance validation. This study outlines a practical roadmap for improving the transparency, reliability, and applicability of AI tools in requirements engineering workflows, particularly in regulated and safety-critical environments where explainability is crucial for adoption and certification. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_09220 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Explainability as a Compliance Requirement: What Regulated Industries Need from AI Tools for Design Artifact Generation Shah, Syed Tauhid Ullah Hussein, Mohammad Barcomb, Ann Moshirpour, Mohammad Software Engineering Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools for automating design artifact generation are increasingly used in Requirements Engineering (RE) to transform textual requirements into structured diagrams and models. While these AI tools, particularly those based on Natural Language Processing (NLP), promise to improve efficiency, their adoption remains limited in regulated industries where transparency and traceability are essential. In this paper, we investigate the explainability gap in AI-driven design artifact generation through semi-structured interviews with ten practitioners from safety-critical industries. We examine how current AI-based tools are integrated into workflows and the challenges arising from their lack of explainability. We also explore mitigation strategies, their impact on project outcomes, and features needed to improve usability. Our findings reveal that non-explainable AI outputs necessitate extensive manual validation, reduce stakeholder trust, struggle to handle domain-specific terminology, disrupt team collaboration, and introduce regulatory compliance risks, often negating the anticipated efficiency benefits. To address these issues, we identify key improvements, including source tracing, providing clear justifications for tool-generated decisions, supporting domain-specific adaptation, and enabling compliance validation. This study outlines a practical roadmap for improving the transparency, reliability, and applicability of AI tools in requirements engineering workflows, particularly in regulated and safety-critical environments where explainability is crucial for adoption and certification. |
| title | Explainability as a Compliance Requirement: What Regulated Industries Need from AI Tools for Design Artifact Generation |
| topic | Software Engineering |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09220 |