Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Jedlička, Petr O., Kos, Šimon, Šmíd, Martin, Vomlel, Jiří, Slavík, Jan
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09988
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866916842323312640
author Jedlička, Petr O.
Kos, Šimon
Šmíd, Martin
Vomlel, Jiří
Slavík, Jan
author_facet Jedlička, Petr O.
Kos, Šimon
Šmíd, Martin
Vomlel, Jiří
Slavík, Jan
contents As we approach the centennial anniversary of modern quantum mechanics this paper revisits the foundational debates through a new poll within the research community. Inspired by the survey by Schlosshauer, Kofler, and Zeilinger at the specialized 2011 Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality conference, we expanded our recruitment to include a more representative sample of the broader community of physicists with the aim to reveal potential shifts in scientists' views and compare our findings with those from several previous polls. While quantum foundations still lack a consensus interpretation, our results indicate a persistent preference for the Copenhagen interpretation. This enduring support likely reflects both the educational emphasis on the Copenhagen interpretation and its pragmatic appeal in avoiding complex metaphysical questions and introducing new notions (e.g., other worlds or the pilot wave). Our findings thus underscore the relative stability of interpretational preferences over the past decades.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_09988
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Has Anything Changed? Tracking Long-Term Interpretational Preferences in Quantum Mechanics
Jedlička, Petr O.
Kos, Šimon
Šmíd, Martin
Vomlel, Jiří
Slavík, Jan
Quantum Physics
History and Philosophy of Physics
As we approach the centennial anniversary of modern quantum mechanics this paper revisits the foundational debates through a new poll within the research community. Inspired by the survey by Schlosshauer, Kofler, and Zeilinger at the specialized 2011 Quantum Physics and the Nature of Reality conference, we expanded our recruitment to include a more representative sample of the broader community of physicists with the aim to reveal potential shifts in scientists' views and compare our findings with those from several previous polls. While quantum foundations still lack a consensus interpretation, our results indicate a persistent preference for the Copenhagen interpretation. This enduring support likely reflects both the educational emphasis on the Copenhagen interpretation and its pragmatic appeal in avoiding complex metaphysical questions and introducing new notions (e.g., other worlds or the pilot wave). Our findings thus underscore the relative stability of interpretational preferences over the past decades.
title Has Anything Changed? Tracking Long-Term Interpretational Preferences in Quantum Mechanics
topic Quantum Physics
History and Philosophy of Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09988