Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10128 |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866908448817414144 |
|---|---|
| author | Ziegler, Anita L. Stumm, Marc-Daniel Prömper, Tim Steimann, Thomas Magnus, Jørgen Mitsos, Alexander |
| author_facet | Ziegler, Anita L. Stumm, Marc-Daniel Prömper, Tim Steimann, Thomas Magnus, Jørgen Mitsos, Alexander |
| contents | When developing a biotechnological process, the microorganism is first designed, e.g., using metabolic engineering. Then, the optimum fermentation parameters are determined on a laboratory scale, and lastly, they are transferred to the bioreactor scale. However, this step-by-step approach is costly and time-consuming and may result in suboptimal configurations. Herein, we present the bilevel optimization formulation SimulKnockReactor, which connects bioreactor design with microbial strain design, an extension of our previous formulation, SimulKnock (Ziegler et al., 2024, AIChE J.). At the upper (bioreactor) level, we minimize investment and operation costs for agitation, aeration, and pH control by determining the size and operating conditions of a continuous stirred-tank reactor - without selecting specific devices like the stirrer type. The lower (cellular) level is based on flux balance analysis and implements optimal reaction knockouts predicted by the upper level. Our results with a core and a genome-scale metabolic model of Escherichia coli show that the substrate is the largest cost factor. Our simultaneous approach outperforms a sequential approach using OptKnock. Namely, the knockouts proposed by OptKnock cannot guarantee the required production capacity in all cases considered. In the case that both approaches deliver feasible results, the total annual costs are the same or lower with SimulKnockReactor, highlighting the advantage of combining cellular and bioreactor levels. This work is a further step towards a fully integrated bioprocess design. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_10128 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Simultaneous Design of Microbe and Bioreactor Ziegler, Anita L. Stumm, Marc-Daniel Prömper, Tim Steimann, Thomas Magnus, Jørgen Mitsos, Alexander Optimization and Control When developing a biotechnological process, the microorganism is first designed, e.g., using metabolic engineering. Then, the optimum fermentation parameters are determined on a laboratory scale, and lastly, they are transferred to the bioreactor scale. However, this step-by-step approach is costly and time-consuming and may result in suboptimal configurations. Herein, we present the bilevel optimization formulation SimulKnockReactor, which connects bioreactor design with microbial strain design, an extension of our previous formulation, SimulKnock (Ziegler et al., 2024, AIChE J.). At the upper (bioreactor) level, we minimize investment and operation costs for agitation, aeration, and pH control by determining the size and operating conditions of a continuous stirred-tank reactor - without selecting specific devices like the stirrer type. The lower (cellular) level is based on flux balance analysis and implements optimal reaction knockouts predicted by the upper level. Our results with a core and a genome-scale metabolic model of Escherichia coli show that the substrate is the largest cost factor. Our simultaneous approach outperforms a sequential approach using OptKnock. Namely, the knockouts proposed by OptKnock cannot guarantee the required production capacity in all cases considered. In the case that both approaches deliver feasible results, the total annual costs are the same or lower with SimulKnockReactor, highlighting the advantage of combining cellular and bioreactor levels. This work is a further step towards a fully integrated bioprocess design. |
| title | Simultaneous Design of Microbe and Bioreactor |
| topic | Optimization and Control |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10128 |