Operator Learning for Consolidation: An Architectural Comparison for DeepONet Variants
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866912956794535936 |
|---|---|
| author | Choi, Yongjin Liu, Chenying Macedo, Jorge |
| author_facet | Choi, Yongjin Liu, Chenying Macedo, Jorge |
| contents | Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets) have emerged as a powerful surrogate modeling framework for learning solution operators in PDE-governed systems. While their use is expanding across engineering disciplines, applications in geotechnical engineering remain limited. This study systematically evaluates several DeepONet architectures for the consolidation problem. We initially consider three architectures: a standard DeepONet with the coefficient of consolidation embedded in the branch net (Models 1 and 2), and a physics-inspired architecture with the coefficient embedded in the trunk net (Model 3). Results show that Model 3 outperforms the standard configurations (Models 1 and 2) but still has limitations when the target solution (excess pore pressures) exhibits significant variation. To overcome this limitation, we propose a Trunknet Fourier feature-enhanced DeepONet (Model 4) that addresses the identified limitations by capturing rapidly varying functions. We further extend Model 4 to 3D scenarios. Although the computational speedup can be modest in the 1D case (1.5-100x compared with traditional solvers), the speedup becomes more pronounced in 3D, reaching approximately 1,000x. Leveraging this efficiency, we offer a conceptual demonstration of DeepONet's potential to accelerate uncertainty quantification in a 3D consolidation problem. Overall, the study highlights the potential of DeepONets to enable efficient, generalizable surrogate modeling in geotechnical applications, advancing the integration of scientific machine learning in geotechnics, which is at an early stage. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_10368 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Operator Learning for Consolidation: An Architectural Comparison for DeepONet Variants Choi, Yongjin Liu, Chenying Macedo, Jorge Machine Learning Geophysics Deep Operator Networks (DeepONets) have emerged as a powerful surrogate modeling framework for learning solution operators in PDE-governed systems. While their use is expanding across engineering disciplines, applications in geotechnical engineering remain limited. This study systematically evaluates several DeepONet architectures for the consolidation problem. We initially consider three architectures: a standard DeepONet with the coefficient of consolidation embedded in the branch net (Models 1 and 2), and a physics-inspired architecture with the coefficient embedded in the trunk net (Model 3). Results show that Model 3 outperforms the standard configurations (Models 1 and 2) but still has limitations when the target solution (excess pore pressures) exhibits significant variation. To overcome this limitation, we propose a Trunknet Fourier feature-enhanced DeepONet (Model 4) that addresses the identified limitations by capturing rapidly varying functions. We further extend Model 4 to 3D scenarios. Although the computational speedup can be modest in the 1D case (1.5-100x compared with traditional solvers), the speedup becomes more pronounced in 3D, reaching approximately 1,000x. Leveraging this efficiency, we offer a conceptual demonstration of DeepONet's potential to accelerate uncertainty quantification in a 3D consolidation problem. Overall, the study highlights the potential of DeepONets to enable efficient, generalizable surrogate modeling in geotechnical applications, advancing the integration of scientific machine learning in geotechnics, which is at an early stage. |
| title | Operator Learning for Consolidation: An Architectural Comparison for DeepONet Variants |
| topic | Machine Learning Geophysics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10368 |