Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feng, Tao, Zhang, Haozhen, Lei, Zijie, Han, Pengrui, Patwary, Mostofa, Shoeybi, Mohammad, Catanzaro, Bryan, You, Jiaxuan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10540
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866918149559943168
author Feng, Tao
Zhang, Haozhen
Lei, Zijie
Han, Pengrui
Patwary, Mostofa
Shoeybi, Mohammad
Catanzaro, Bryan
You, Jiaxuan
author_facet Feng, Tao
Zhang, Haozhen
Lei, Zijie
Han, Pengrui
Patwary, Mostofa
Shoeybi, Mohammad
Catanzaro, Bryan
You, Jiaxuan
contents The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has created a diverse landscape of models, each excelling at different tasks. This diversity drives researchers to employ multiple LLMs in practice, leaving behind valuable multi-LLM log data. This naturally leads to the question of whether such logs can be fully leveraged to fuse LLMs' complementary capabilities. Although prior work has explored various strategies for integrating multiple LLMs, we argue that practical fusion must meet two essential requirements: (1) compatibility with real-world serving scenarios (e.g., local and API-based serving), and (2) flexibility to operate at different stages of the LLM pipeline to meet varied user needs (e.g., fine-tuning and inference stages). To this end, we introduce LLMFusionBench, a large-scale benchmark for LLM fusion that spans 14 tasks across five domains, with responses from 20 open-source LLMs (8B--671B) totaling 103M tokens. Building on LLMFusionBench, we propose FusionFactory, a systematic framework with three elaborated levels: (1) query-level fusion via tailored LLM routers, (2) thought-level fusion leveraging retrieved abstract reasoning templates, and (3) model-level fusion via distillation from top-ranked responses. Experiments show that FusionFactory consistently outperforms the best individual LLM across all 14 benchmarks, with the optimal fusion configuration varying across benchmarks, highlighting the promise of multi-LLM log data as a practical foundation for fusing diverse LLM capabilities.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_10540
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle FusionFactory: Fusing LLM Capabilities with Multi-LLM Log Data
Feng, Tao
Zhang, Haozhen
Lei, Zijie
Han, Pengrui
Patwary, Mostofa
Shoeybi, Mohammad
Catanzaro, Bryan
You, Jiaxuan
Machine Learning
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has created a diverse landscape of models, each excelling at different tasks. This diversity drives researchers to employ multiple LLMs in practice, leaving behind valuable multi-LLM log data. This naturally leads to the question of whether such logs can be fully leveraged to fuse LLMs' complementary capabilities. Although prior work has explored various strategies for integrating multiple LLMs, we argue that practical fusion must meet two essential requirements: (1) compatibility with real-world serving scenarios (e.g., local and API-based serving), and (2) flexibility to operate at different stages of the LLM pipeline to meet varied user needs (e.g., fine-tuning and inference stages). To this end, we introduce LLMFusionBench, a large-scale benchmark for LLM fusion that spans 14 tasks across five domains, with responses from 20 open-source LLMs (8B--671B) totaling 103M tokens. Building on LLMFusionBench, we propose FusionFactory, a systematic framework with three elaborated levels: (1) query-level fusion via tailored LLM routers, (2) thought-level fusion leveraging retrieved abstract reasoning templates, and (3) model-level fusion via distillation from top-ranked responses. Experiments show that FusionFactory consistently outperforms the best individual LLM across all 14 benchmarks, with the optimal fusion configuration varying across benchmarks, highlighting the promise of multi-LLM log data as a practical foundation for fusing diverse LLM capabilities.
title FusionFactory: Fusing LLM Capabilities with Multi-LLM Log Data
topic Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10540