Testing Hypotheses from the Social Approval Theory of Online Hate: An Analysis of 110 Million Messages from Parler

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Markowitz, David M., Taylor, Samuel Hardman
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866912722905464832
author Markowitz, David M.
Taylor, Samuel Hardman
author_facet Markowitz, David M.
Taylor, Samuel Hardman
contents We examined how online hate is motivated by receiving social approval via Walther's (2024) social approval theory of online hate, which argues (H1a) more signals of social approval on hate messages predicts more subsequent hate messages, and (H1b) as social approval increases, hate speech becomes more extreme. Using 110 million messages from Parler (2018-2021), we observed the number of upvotes received on a hate speech post was unassociated with hate speech in one's next post and during the next month, three-months, and six-months. The number of upvotes received on (extreme) hate speech comments, however, was positively associated with (extreme) hate speech during the next week, month, three-months, and six-months. Between-person effects revealed an average positive relationship between social approval and hate speech production at all time intervals. For comments, social approval linked more strongly to online hate than social disapproval. Social approval is a critical mechanism facilitating online hate propagation.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_10810
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Testing Hypotheses from the Social Approval Theory of Online Hate: An Analysis of 110 Million Messages from Parler
Markowitz, David M.
Taylor, Samuel Hardman
Computation and Language
Social and Information Networks
We examined how online hate is motivated by receiving social approval via Walther's (2024) social approval theory of online hate, which argues (H1a) more signals of social approval on hate messages predicts more subsequent hate messages, and (H1b) as social approval increases, hate speech becomes more extreme. Using 110 million messages from Parler (2018-2021), we observed the number of upvotes received on a hate speech post was unassociated with hate speech in one's next post and during the next month, three-months, and six-months. The number of upvotes received on (extreme) hate speech comments, however, was positively associated with (extreme) hate speech during the next week, month, three-months, and six-months. Between-person effects revealed an average positive relationship between social approval and hate speech production at all time intervals. For comments, social approval linked more strongly to online hate than social disapproval. Social approval is a critical mechanism facilitating online hate propagation.
title Testing Hypotheses from the Social Approval Theory of Online Hate: An Analysis of 110 Million Messages from Parler
topic Computation and Language
Social and Information Networks
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.10810