Practical Subarchitectures for Optimal Quantum Layout Synthesis

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Milkevych, Kostiantyn V., van de Pol, Jaco, Shaik, Irfansha
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866913945877479424
author Milkevych, Kostiantyn V.
van de Pol, Jaco
Shaik, Irfansha
author_facet Milkevych, Kostiantyn V.
van de Pol, Jaco
Shaik, Irfansha
contents Quantum Layout Synthesis (QLS) maps a logical quantum circuit to a physical quantum platform. Optimal QLS minimizes circuit size and depth, which is essential to reduce the noise on current quantum platforms. Optimal QLS is an NP-hard problem, so in practice, one maps a quantum circuit to a subset of the complete quantum platform. However, to guarantee optimality, one still has to consider exponentially many subarchitectures. We introduce an effective method to enumerate relevant subarchitectures. This reduces the number of considered subarchitectures, as well as the number of expensive subgraph isomorphism checks, thus boosting Optimal QLS with subarchitectures. To do so, we assume a fixed number of ancilla qubits that can be used in the mapping. We guarantee optimality of the quantum layout, for the selected ancilla bound. We evaluate our technique on a number of benchmarks and compare it with state-of-the-art Optimal QLS tools with and without using subarchitectures.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_12976
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Practical Subarchitectures for Optimal Quantum Layout Synthesis
Milkevych, Kostiantyn V.
van de Pol, Jaco
Shaik, Irfansha
Quantum Physics
Quantum Layout Synthesis (QLS) maps a logical quantum circuit to a physical quantum platform. Optimal QLS minimizes circuit size and depth, which is essential to reduce the noise on current quantum platforms. Optimal QLS is an NP-hard problem, so in practice, one maps a quantum circuit to a subset of the complete quantum platform. However, to guarantee optimality, one still has to consider exponentially many subarchitectures. We introduce an effective method to enumerate relevant subarchitectures. This reduces the number of considered subarchitectures, as well as the number of expensive subgraph isomorphism checks, thus boosting Optimal QLS with subarchitectures. To do so, we assume a fixed number of ancilla qubits that can be used in the mapping. We guarantee optimality of the quantum layout, for the selected ancilla bound. We evaluate our technique on a number of benchmarks and compare it with state-of-the-art Optimal QLS tools with and without using subarchitectures.
title Practical Subarchitectures for Optimal Quantum Layout Synthesis
topic Quantum Physics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12976