Cover Image

Demystifying Feature Requests: Leveraging LLMs to Refine Feature Requests in Open-Source Software

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	KC, Pragyan, Ghandiparsi, Rambod, Herron, Thomas, Heaps, John, Hosseini, Mitra Bokaei
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Software Engineering
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Towards Better Requirements from the Crowd: Developer Engagement with Feature Requests in Open Source Software
by: KC, Pragyan, et al.
Published: (2025)

Toward Regulatory Compliance: A few-shot Learning Approach to Extract Processing Activities
by: KC, Pragyan, et al.
Published: (2024)

An Analysis of Automated Use Case Component Extraction from Scenarios using ChatGPT
by: KC, Pragyan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Feature Request Analysis and Processing: Tasks, Techniques, and Trends
by: Niu, Feifei, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Death Spiral of Open Source Projects: A Post-Mortem Analysis of Pull Request Workflow Dynamics
by: Kaushik, Mohit, et al.
Published: (2026)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

Predicting Abandonment of Open Source Software Projects with An Integrated Feature Framework
by: Xu, Yiming, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
by: Amore, Teal, et al.
Published: (2026)

How Do Agentic AI Systems Deal With Software Energy Concerns? A Pull Request-Based Study
by: Mitul, Tanjum Motin, et al.
Published: (2025)

Adaptive Request Scheduling for CodeLLM Serving with SLA Guarantees
by: Chang, Shi, et al.
Published: (2025)

An Empirical Study on the Amount of Changes Required for Merge Request Acceptance
by: Kansab, Samah, et al.
Published: (2025)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2025)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
by: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Published: (2026)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
by: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Published: (2025)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
by: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Improving Merge Pipeline Throughput in Continuous Integration via Pull Request Prioritization
by: Jungwirth, Maximilian, et al.
Published: (2025)

Group versus Individual Review Requests: Tradeoffs in Speed and Quality at Mozilla Firefox
by: Kucera, Matej, et al.
Published: (2026)

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
by: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Analyzing DevOps Practices Through Merge Request Data: A Case Study in Networking Software Company
by: Kansab, Samah, et al.
Published: (2025)

What Developers Ask to ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests? an Exploratory Study
by: Silva, Julyanara R., et al.
Published: (2025)

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
by: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Published: (2026)

Mint: Cost-Efficient Tracing with All Requests Collection via Commonality and Variability Analysis
by: Huang, Haiyu, et al.
Published: (2024)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
by: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2026)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
by: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Published: (2026)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
by: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Published: (2026)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2021)

Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Review
by: Zhang, Daoan, et al.
Published: (2026)

MELT: Mining Effective Lightweight Transformations from Pull Requests
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2023)

LLM-Redactor: An Empirical Evaluation of Eight Techniques for Privacy-Preserving LLM Requests
by: Agyemang, Justice Owusu, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Mixed-Methods Study of Open-Source Software Maintainers On Vulnerability Management and Platform Security Features
by: Ayala, Jessy, et al.
Published: (2024)

Demystifying Issues, Causes and Solutions in LLM Open-Source Projects
by: Cai, Yangxiao, et al.
Published: (2024)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Published: (2026)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
by: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Published: (2026)