LMM4Edit: Benchmarking and Evaluating Multimodal Image Editing with LMMs
Fuente:
arXiv
Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866915482529955840 |
|---|---|
| author | Xu, Zitong Duan, Huiyu Liu, Bingnan Ma, Guangji Wang, Jiarui Yang, Liu Gao, Shiqi Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Jia Min, Xiongkuo Zhai, Guangtao Lin, Weisi |
| author_facet | Xu, Zitong Duan, Huiyu Liu, Bingnan Ma, Guangji Wang, Jiarui Yang, Liu Gao, Shiqi Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Jia Min, Xiongkuo Zhai, Guangtao Lin, Weisi |
| contents | The rapid advancement of Text-guided Image Editing (TIE) enables image modifications through text prompts. However, current TIE models still struggle to balance image quality, editing alignment, and consistency with the original image, limiting their practical applications. Existing TIE evaluation benchmarks and metrics have limitations on scale or alignment with human perception. To this end, we introduce EBench-18K, the first large-scale image Editing Benchmark including 18K edited images with fine-grained human preference annotations for evaluating TIE. Specifically, EBench-18K includes 1,080 source images with corresponding editing prompts across 21 tasks, 18K+ edited images produced by 17 state-of-the-art TIE models, 55K+ mean opinion scores (MOSs) assessed from three evaluation dimensions, and 18K+ question-answering (QA) pairs. Based on EBench-18K, we employ outstanding LMMs to assess edited images, while the evaluation results, in turn, provide insights into assessing the alignment between the LMMs' understanding ability and human preferences. Then, we propose LMM4Edit, a LMM-based metric for evaluating image Editing models from perceptual quality, editing alignment, attribute preservation, and task-specific QA accuracy in an all-in-one manner. Extensive experiments show that LMM4Edit achieves outstanding performance and aligns well with human preference. Zero-shot validation on the other datasets also shows the generalization ability of our model. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/IntMeGroup/LMM4Edit. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_16193 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | LMM4Edit: Benchmarking and Evaluating Multimodal Image Editing with LMMs Xu, Zitong Duan, Huiyu Liu, Bingnan Ma, Guangji Wang, Jiarui Yang, Liu Gao, Shiqi Wang, Xiaoyu Wang, Jia Min, Xiongkuo Zhai, Guangtao Lin, Weisi Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Multimedia The rapid advancement of Text-guided Image Editing (TIE) enables image modifications through text prompts. However, current TIE models still struggle to balance image quality, editing alignment, and consistency with the original image, limiting their practical applications. Existing TIE evaluation benchmarks and metrics have limitations on scale or alignment with human perception. To this end, we introduce EBench-18K, the first large-scale image Editing Benchmark including 18K edited images with fine-grained human preference annotations for evaluating TIE. Specifically, EBench-18K includes 1,080 source images with corresponding editing prompts across 21 tasks, 18K+ edited images produced by 17 state-of-the-art TIE models, 55K+ mean opinion scores (MOSs) assessed from three evaluation dimensions, and 18K+ question-answering (QA) pairs. Based on EBench-18K, we employ outstanding LMMs to assess edited images, while the evaluation results, in turn, provide insights into assessing the alignment between the LMMs' understanding ability and human preferences. Then, we propose LMM4Edit, a LMM-based metric for evaluating image Editing models from perceptual quality, editing alignment, attribute preservation, and task-specific QA accuracy in an all-in-one manner. Extensive experiments show that LMM4Edit achieves outstanding performance and aligns well with human preference. Zero-shot validation on the other datasets also shows the generalization ability of our model. The dataset and code are available at https://github.com/IntMeGroup/LMM4Edit. |
| title | LMM4Edit: Benchmarking and Evaluating Multimodal Image Editing with LMMs |
| topic | Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Multimedia |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16193 |