Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Pitale, Mandar, Frtunikj, Jelena, Priyadershi, Abhinaw, Singh, Vasu, Spence, Maria
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17118
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866909701699010560
author Pitale, Mandar
Frtunikj, Jelena
Priyadershi, Abhinaw
Singh, Vasu
Spence, Maria
author_facet Pitale, Mandar
Frtunikj, Jelena
Priyadershi, Abhinaw
Singh, Vasu
Spence, Maria
contents AI has become integral to safety-critical areas like autonomous driving systems (ADS) and robotics. The architecture of recent autonomous systems are trending toward end-to-end (E2E) monolithic architectures such as large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs). In this paper, we review different architectural solutions and then evaluate the efficacy of common safety analyses such as failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) and fault tree analysis (FTA). We show how these techniques can be improved for the intricate nature of the foundational models, particularly in how they form and utilize latent representations. We introduce HySAFE-AI, Hybrid Safety Architectural Analysis Framework for AI Systems, a hybrid framework that adapts traditional methods to evaluate the safety of AI systems. Lastly, we offer hints of future work and suggestions to guide the evolution of future AI safety standards.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_17118
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle HySafe-AI: Hybrid Safety Architectural Analysis Framework for AI Systems: A Case Study
Pitale, Mandar
Frtunikj, Jelena
Priyadershi, Abhinaw
Singh, Vasu
Spence, Maria
Artificial Intelligence
AI has become integral to safety-critical areas like autonomous driving systems (ADS) and robotics. The architecture of recent autonomous systems are trending toward end-to-end (E2E) monolithic architectures such as large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs). In this paper, we review different architectural solutions and then evaluate the efficacy of common safety analyses such as failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) and fault tree analysis (FTA). We show how these techniques can be improved for the intricate nature of the foundational models, particularly in how they form and utilize latent representations. We introduce HySAFE-AI, Hybrid Safety Architectural Analysis Framework for AI Systems, a hybrid framework that adapts traditional methods to evaluate the safety of AI systems. Lastly, we offer hints of future work and suggestions to guide the evolution of future AI safety standards.
title HySafe-AI: Hybrid Safety Architectural Analysis Framework for AI Systems: A Case Study
topic Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17118