Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Garousi, Vahid, Jafarov, Zafar, Mövsümova, Aytan, Namazov, Atif
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17930
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866911532530532352
author Garousi, Vahid
Jafarov, Zafar
Mövsümova, Aytan
Namazov, Atif
author_facet Garousi, Vahid
Jafarov, Zafar
Mövsümova, Aytan
Namazov, Atif
contents Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools such as GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT are increasingly used in software engineering (SE) for tasks such as code, test, and documentation generation. However, engineers often face uncertainty about when to trust, refine, or discard AI-generated artifacts. We present a pragmatic workflow, complemented by a four-quadrant decision model, that formalizes how developers iteratively prompt, inspect, refine, and, when needed, fall back to manual work. The workflow and decision model were derived from a grey literature review and field observations across three industrial settings in Türkiye and Azerbaijan. Two real-world scenarios demonstrate the workflow's practical value, showing how engineers navigate key decision points when using AI. Our approach offers lightweight, structured guidance to support more deliberate and quality-aware use of AI tools in everyday SE tasks.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_17930
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle How Software Engineers Engage with AI: A Pragmatic Workflow
Garousi, Vahid
Jafarov, Zafar
Mövsümova, Aytan
Namazov, Atif
Software Engineering
Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools such as GitHub Copilot and ChatGPT are increasingly used in software engineering (SE) for tasks such as code, test, and documentation generation. However, engineers often face uncertainty about when to trust, refine, or discard AI-generated artifacts. We present a pragmatic workflow, complemented by a four-quadrant decision model, that formalizes how developers iteratively prompt, inspect, refine, and, when needed, fall back to manual work. The workflow and decision model were derived from a grey literature review and field observations across three industrial settings in Türkiye and Azerbaijan. Two real-world scenarios demonstrate the workflow's practical value, showing how engineers navigate key decision points when using AI. Our approach offers lightweight, structured guidance to support more deliberate and quality-aware use of AI tools in everyday SE tasks.
title How Software Engineers Engage with AI: A Pragmatic Workflow
topic Software Engineering
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.17930