Scaling Pedestrian Crossing Analysis to 100 U.S. Cities via AI-based Segmentation of Satellite Imagery
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866914283850301440 |
|---|---|
| author | Moran, Marcel Gupta, Arunav Qian, Jiali Laefer, Debra |
| author_facet | Moran, Marcel Gupta, Arunav Qian, Jiali Laefer, Debra |
| contents | Accurately measuring street dimensions is essential to evaluating how their design influences both travel behavior and safety. However, gathering street-level information at city scale with precision is difficult given the quantity and complexity of urban intersections. To address this challenge in the context of pedestrian crossings - a crucial component of walkability - we introduce a scalable and accurate method for automatically measuring crossing distance at both marked and unmarked crosswalks, applied to America's 100 largest cities. First, OpenStreetMap coordinates were used to retrieve satellite imagery of intersections throughout each city, totaling roughly three million images. Next, Meta's Segment Anything Model was trained on a manually-labelled subset of these images to differentiate drivable from non-drivable surfaces (i.e., roads vs. sidewalks). Third, all available crossing edges from OpenStreetMap were extracted. Finally, crossing edges were overlaid on the segmented intersection images, and a grow-cut algorithm was applied to connect each edge to its adjacent non-drivable surface (e.g., sidewalk, private property, etc.), thus enabling the calculation of crossing distance. This achieved 93 percent accuracy in measuring crossing distance, with a median absolute error of 2 feet 3 inches (0.69 meters), when compared to manually-verified data for an entire city. Across the 100 largest US cities, median crossing distance ranges from 32 feet to 78 feet (9.8 to 23.8m), with detectable regional patterns. Median crossing distance also displays a positive relationship with cities' year of incorporation, illustrating in a novel way how American cities increasingly emphasize wider (and more car-centric) streets. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_20497 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Scaling Pedestrian Crossing Analysis to 100 U.S. Cities via AI-based Segmentation of Satellite Imagery Moran, Marcel Gupta, Arunav Qian, Jiali Laefer, Debra Physics and Society Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability Accurately measuring street dimensions is essential to evaluating how their design influences both travel behavior and safety. However, gathering street-level information at city scale with precision is difficult given the quantity and complexity of urban intersections. To address this challenge in the context of pedestrian crossings - a crucial component of walkability - we introduce a scalable and accurate method for automatically measuring crossing distance at both marked and unmarked crosswalks, applied to America's 100 largest cities. First, OpenStreetMap coordinates were used to retrieve satellite imagery of intersections throughout each city, totaling roughly three million images. Next, Meta's Segment Anything Model was trained on a manually-labelled subset of these images to differentiate drivable from non-drivable surfaces (i.e., roads vs. sidewalks). Third, all available crossing edges from OpenStreetMap were extracted. Finally, crossing edges were overlaid on the segmented intersection images, and a grow-cut algorithm was applied to connect each edge to its adjacent non-drivable surface (e.g., sidewalk, private property, etc.), thus enabling the calculation of crossing distance. This achieved 93 percent accuracy in measuring crossing distance, with a median absolute error of 2 feet 3 inches (0.69 meters), when compared to manually-verified data for an entire city. Across the 100 largest US cities, median crossing distance ranges from 32 feet to 78 feet (9.8 to 23.8m), with detectable regional patterns. Median crossing distance also displays a positive relationship with cities' year of incorporation, illustrating in a novel way how American cities increasingly emphasize wider (and more car-centric) streets. |
| title | Scaling Pedestrian Crossing Analysis to 100 U.S. Cities via AI-based Segmentation of Satellite Imagery |
| topic | Physics and Society Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.20497 |