User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu, Yuhan, Zhang, Michael J. Q., Choi, Eunsol
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915533354434560
author Liu, Yuhan
Zhang, Michael J. Q.
Choi, Eunsol
author_facet Liu, Yuhan
Zhang, Michael J. Q.
Choi, Eunsol
contents Once language models (LMs) are deployed, they can interact with users long-term, ideally evolving based on their feedback. Asking for direct user feedback can be disruptive; thus, we study harvesting implicit user feedback from user-LM interaction logs. We study two user-LM interaction datasets (WildChat and LMSYS). First, we analyze user feedback in the user-LLM conversation logs, providing insights into when and why such feedback occurs. Second, we study harvesting learning signals from such implicit user feedback. Specifically, we study whether incorporating the contents of user feedback (e.g., user wanted clarification), in addition to the polarity of the feedback, can improve the model performance. We observe mixed results, showing this helps in short human-designed questions (MTBench) but not on longer and more complex questions (WildBench). Together, we provide an in-depth study of implicit user feedback, showing its potential and limitations.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2507_23158
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal
Liu, Yuhan
Zhang, Michael J. Q.
Choi, Eunsol
Computation and Language
Once language models (LMs) are deployed, they can interact with users long-term, ideally evolving based on their feedback. Asking for direct user feedback can be disruptive; thus, we study harvesting implicit user feedback from user-LM interaction logs. We study two user-LM interaction datasets (WildChat and LMSYS). First, we analyze user feedback in the user-LLM conversation logs, providing insights into when and why such feedback occurs. Second, we study harvesting learning signals from such implicit user feedback. Specifically, we study whether incorporating the contents of user feedback (e.g., user wanted clarification), in addition to the polarity of the feedback, can improve the model performance. We observe mixed results, showing this helps in short human-designed questions (MTBench) but not on longer and more complex questions (WildBench). Together, we provide an in-depth study of implicit user feedback, showing its potential and limitations.
title User Feedback in Human-LLM Dialogues: A Lens to Understand Users But Noisy as a Learning Signal
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23158