Implementasi dan Pengujian Polimorfisme pada Malware Menggunakan Dasar Payload Metasploit Framework
Fuente:
arXiv
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | Preprint |
| Publicado: |
2025
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| _version_ | 1866909718171090944 |
|---|---|
| author | Zagi, Luqman Muhammad |
| author_facet | Zagi, Luqman Muhammad |
| contents | Malware change day by day and become sophisticated. Not only the complexity of the algorithm that generating malware, but also the camouflage methods. Camouflage, formerly, only need a simple encryption. Now, camouflage are able to change the pattern of code automatically. This term called Polymorphism. This property is usually used to create a metamorphic and a polymorphic malware. Although it has been around since 1990 still quite tricky to detect. In general, there are three obfuscation techniques to create the nature of polymorphism. That techniques are dead code insertion, register substitution, and instruction replacement. This technique can be added to the Metasploit Framework via Ghost Writing Assembly to get ASM files. The detection methods that be used are VT-notify, Context Triggered Piecewise Hash (CTPH), and direct scanning with an antivirus that has been selected. VTnotify show nothing wrong with the files. The best CTPH value is generated by a mixture of technique (average: 52.3125%), while if it is compared to the number of changes made, instruction replacement have the best comparative value (0.0256). The result of using antivirus scanning produces a variety of different results. Antivirus with behavioural-based detection has a possibility to detect this polymorphism. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_00874 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Implementasi dan Pengujian Polimorfisme pada Malware Menggunakan Dasar Payload Metasploit Framework Zagi, Luqman Muhammad Cryptography and Security Malware change day by day and become sophisticated. Not only the complexity of the algorithm that generating malware, but also the camouflage methods. Camouflage, formerly, only need a simple encryption. Now, camouflage are able to change the pattern of code automatically. This term called Polymorphism. This property is usually used to create a metamorphic and a polymorphic malware. Although it has been around since 1990 still quite tricky to detect. In general, there are three obfuscation techniques to create the nature of polymorphism. That techniques are dead code insertion, register substitution, and instruction replacement. This technique can be added to the Metasploit Framework via Ghost Writing Assembly to get ASM files. The detection methods that be used are VT-notify, Context Triggered Piecewise Hash (CTPH), and direct scanning with an antivirus that has been selected. VTnotify show nothing wrong with the files. The best CTPH value is generated by a mixture of technique (average: 52.3125%), while if it is compared to the number of changes made, instruction replacement have the best comparative value (0.0256). The result of using antivirus scanning produces a variety of different results. Antivirus with behavioural-based detection has a possibility to detect this polymorphism. |
| title | Implementasi dan Pengujian Polimorfisme pada Malware Menggunakan Dasar Payload Metasploit Framework |
| topic | Cryptography and Security |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00874 |