Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: German, Gabriel, Hidalgo, Juan Carlos
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01017
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866908674855796736
author German, Gabriel
Hidalgo, Juan Carlos
author_facet German, Gabriel
Hidalgo, Juan Carlos
contents We study inflationary constraints from reheating on two classes of single-field inflationary models: a generalized $α$-attractor with potential $V(ϕ) = V_0 \!\left(1 - \sech^p\!\left[ϕ/(\sqrt{6α}\,M_{Pl})\right]\right)$ and the $α$-Starobinsky model with potential $V(ϕ) = V_0 \!\left(1 - e^{- \sqrt{2/(3α)}\, ϕ/ M_{Pl}} \right)^2$. Using a semi-analytical relation that connects inflationary dynamics to reheating, we solve for the horizon-crossing field value and calculate the scalar spectral index $n_s$, the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$, and the reheating temperature $T_{re}$. We consider three perturbative decay channels of the inflaton: gravitational, Yukawa (fermionic), and scalar. The parameter space spanned by $(α,p,ω_{re})$ for the first model and $(α,ω_{re})$ for the second is explored and compared with recent measurements from Planck and ACT DR6, as well as BAO from DESI DR2. For clarity, we emphasize that ACT DR6 alone is fully compatible with Planck regarding $n_s$. The upward shift toward $n_s \simeq 0.975$ appears only when DESI DR2 BAO are combined with CMB datasets (Planck+DESI, ACT+DESI, SPT-3G+DESI), and is likewise seen in the P--ACT--LB2+DESI combination. CMB-only combinations (e.g., Planck+ACT or Planck+ACT+SPT-3G) primarily refine constraints and do not by themselves raise $n_s$. Our comparisons and model assessments are therefore made with this distinction in mind: CMB-only constraints versus CMB+DESI combinations. We conclude that both models remain consistent with current CMB-only data in restricted regions of parameter space, and that residual tension with the higher $n_s$ favored by CMB+DESI persists.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_01017
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Viability of generalized $α$-inflation from Planck, ACT, and DESI Data
German, Gabriel
Hidalgo, Juan Carlos
Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
We study inflationary constraints from reheating on two classes of single-field inflationary models: a generalized $α$-attractor with potential $V(ϕ) = V_0 \!\left(1 - \sech^p\!\left[ϕ/(\sqrt{6α}\,M_{Pl})\right]\right)$ and the $α$-Starobinsky model with potential $V(ϕ) = V_0 \!\left(1 - e^{- \sqrt{2/(3α)}\, ϕ/ M_{Pl}} \right)^2$. Using a semi-analytical relation that connects inflationary dynamics to reheating, we solve for the horizon-crossing field value and calculate the scalar spectral index $n_s$, the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$, and the reheating temperature $T_{re}$. We consider three perturbative decay channels of the inflaton: gravitational, Yukawa (fermionic), and scalar. The parameter space spanned by $(α,p,ω_{re})$ for the first model and $(α,ω_{re})$ for the second is explored and compared with recent measurements from Planck and ACT DR6, as well as BAO from DESI DR2. For clarity, we emphasize that ACT DR6 alone is fully compatible with Planck regarding $n_s$. The upward shift toward $n_s \simeq 0.975$ appears only when DESI DR2 BAO are combined with CMB datasets (Planck+DESI, ACT+DESI, SPT-3G+DESI), and is likewise seen in the P--ACT--LB2+DESI combination. CMB-only combinations (e.g., Planck+ACT or Planck+ACT+SPT-3G) primarily refine constraints and do not by themselves raise $n_s$. Our comparisons and model assessments are therefore made with this distinction in mind: CMB-only constraints versus CMB+DESI combinations. We conclude that both models remain consistent with current CMB-only data in restricted regions of parameter space, and that residual tension with the higher $n_s$ favored by CMB+DESI persists.
title Viability of generalized $α$-inflation from Planck, ACT, and DESI Data
topic Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01017