Asking the Right Questions: Benchmarking Large Language Models in the Development of Clinical Consultation Templates

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: McCoy, Liam G., Haredasht, Fateme Nateghi, Chopra, Kanav, Wu, David, Wu, David JH, Conteh, Abass, Khemani, Sarita, Maharaj, Saloni Kumar, Ravi, Vishnu, Pahwa, Arth, Weng, Yingjie, Rosengaus, Leah, Giang, Lena, Li, Kelvin Zhenghao, Jee, Olivia, Shirvani, Daniel, Goh, Ethan, Chen, Jonathan H.
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866915612528214016
author McCoy, Liam G.
Haredasht, Fateme Nateghi
Chopra, Kanav
Wu, David
Wu, David JH
Conteh, Abass
Khemani, Sarita
Maharaj, Saloni Kumar
Ravi, Vishnu
Pahwa, Arth
Weng, Yingjie
Rosengaus, Leah
Giang, Lena
Li, Kelvin Zhenghao
Jee, Olivia
Shirvani, Daniel
Goh, Ethan
Chen, Jonathan H.
author_facet McCoy, Liam G.
Haredasht, Fateme Nateghi
Chopra, Kanav
Wu, David
Wu, David JH
Conteh, Abass
Khemani, Sarita
Maharaj, Saloni Kumar
Ravi, Vishnu
Pahwa, Arth
Weng, Yingjie
Rosengaus, Leah
Giang, Lena
Li, Kelvin Zhenghao
Jee, Olivia
Shirvani, Daniel
Goh, Ethan
Chen, Jonathan H.
contents This study evaluates the capacity of large language models (LLMs) to generate structured clinical consultation templates for electronic consultation. Using 145 expert-crafted templates developed and routinely used by Stanford's eConsult team, we assess frontier models -- including o3, GPT-4o, Kimi K2, Claude 4 Sonnet, Llama 3 70B, and Gemini 2.5 Pro -- for their ability to produce clinically coherent, concise, and prioritized clinical question schemas. Through a multi-agent pipeline combining prompt optimization, semantic autograding, and prioritization analysis, we show that while models like o3 achieve high comprehensiveness (up to 92.2\%), they consistently generate excessively long templates and fail to correctly prioritize the most clinically important questions under length constraints. Performance varies across specialties, with significant degradation in narrative-driven fields such as psychiatry and pain medicine. Our findings demonstrate that LLMs can enhance structured clinical information exchange between physicians, while highlighting the need for more robust evaluation methods that capture a model's ability to prioritize clinically salient information within the time constraints of real-world physician communication.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_01159
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Asking the Right Questions: Benchmarking Large Language Models in the Development of Clinical Consultation Templates
McCoy, Liam G.
Haredasht, Fateme Nateghi
Chopra, Kanav
Wu, David
Wu, David JH
Conteh, Abass
Khemani, Sarita
Maharaj, Saloni Kumar
Ravi, Vishnu
Pahwa, Arth
Weng, Yingjie
Rosengaus, Leah
Giang, Lena
Li, Kelvin Zhenghao
Jee, Olivia
Shirvani, Daniel
Goh, Ethan
Chen, Jonathan H.
Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
This study evaluates the capacity of large language models (LLMs) to generate structured clinical consultation templates for electronic consultation. Using 145 expert-crafted templates developed and routinely used by Stanford's eConsult team, we assess frontier models -- including o3, GPT-4o, Kimi K2, Claude 4 Sonnet, Llama 3 70B, and Gemini 2.5 Pro -- for their ability to produce clinically coherent, concise, and prioritized clinical question schemas. Through a multi-agent pipeline combining prompt optimization, semantic autograding, and prioritization analysis, we show that while models like o3 achieve high comprehensiveness (up to 92.2\%), they consistently generate excessively long templates and fail to correctly prioritize the most clinically important questions under length constraints. Performance varies across specialties, with significant degradation in narrative-driven fields such as psychiatry and pain medicine. Our findings demonstrate that LLMs can enhance structured clinical information exchange between physicians, while highlighting the need for more robust evaluation methods that capture a model's ability to prioritize clinically salient information within the time constraints of real-world physician communication.
title Asking the Right Questions: Benchmarking Large Language Models in the Development of Clinical Consultation Templates
topic Computation and Language
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01159