Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Han, Zhiyuan, Zhu, Beier, Xu, Yanlong, Song, Peipei, Yang, Xun
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01181
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866915545460244480
author Han, Zhiyuan
Zhu, Beier
Xu, Yanlong
Song, Peipei
Yang, Xun
author_facet Han, Zhiyuan
Zhu, Beier
Xu, Yanlong
Song, Peipei
Yang, Xun
contents Despite their strong performance in multimodal emotion reasoning, existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often overlook the scenarios involving emotion conflicts, where emotional cues from different modalities are inconsistent. To fill this gap, we first introduce CA-MER, a new benchmark designed to examine MLLMs under realistic emotion conflicts. It consists of three subsets: video-aligned, audio-aligned, and consistent, where only one or all modalities reflect the true emotion. However, evaluations on our CA-MER reveal that current state-of-the-art emotion MLLMs systematically over-rely on audio signal during emotion conflicts, neglecting critical cues from visual modality. To mitigate this bias, we propose MoSEAR, a parameter-efficient framework that promotes balanced modality integration. MoSEAR consists of two modules: (1)MoSE, modality-specific experts with a regularized gating mechanism that reduces modality bias in the fine-tuning heads; and (2)AR, an attention reallocation mechanism that rebalances modality contributions in frozen backbones during inference. Our framework offers two key advantages: it mitigates emotion conflicts and improves performance on consistent samples-without incurring a trade-off between audio and visual modalities. Experiments on multiple benchmarks-including MER2023, EMER, DFEW, and our CA-MER-demonstrate that MoSEAR achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly under modality conflict conditions.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_01181
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Benchmarking and Bridging Emotion Conflicts for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning
Han, Zhiyuan
Zhu, Beier
Xu, Yanlong
Song, Peipei
Yang, Xun
Artificial Intelligence
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Multimedia
Sound
Audio and Speech Processing
68
I.2.10
Despite their strong performance in multimodal emotion reasoning, existing Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) often overlook the scenarios involving emotion conflicts, where emotional cues from different modalities are inconsistent. To fill this gap, we first introduce CA-MER, a new benchmark designed to examine MLLMs under realistic emotion conflicts. It consists of three subsets: video-aligned, audio-aligned, and consistent, where only one or all modalities reflect the true emotion. However, evaluations on our CA-MER reveal that current state-of-the-art emotion MLLMs systematically over-rely on audio signal during emotion conflicts, neglecting critical cues from visual modality. To mitigate this bias, we propose MoSEAR, a parameter-efficient framework that promotes balanced modality integration. MoSEAR consists of two modules: (1)MoSE, modality-specific experts with a regularized gating mechanism that reduces modality bias in the fine-tuning heads; and (2)AR, an attention reallocation mechanism that rebalances modality contributions in frozen backbones during inference. Our framework offers two key advantages: it mitigates emotion conflicts and improves performance on consistent samples-without incurring a trade-off between audio and visual modalities. Experiments on multiple benchmarks-including MER2023, EMER, DFEW, and our CA-MER-demonstrate that MoSEAR achieves state-of-the-art performance, particularly under modality conflict conditions.
title Benchmarking and Bridging Emotion Conflicts for Multimodal Emotion Reasoning
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Multimedia
Sound
Audio and Speech Processing
68
I.2.10
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01181