Copertina

A Global South Strategy for Evaluating Research Value with ChatGPT

Fuente: arXiv

Salvato in:

Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali:	Nunkoo, Robin, Thelwall, Mike
Natura:	Preprint
Pubblicazione:	2025
Soggetti:	Digital Libraries
Accesso online:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Aggiungi Tag Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!

Documenti analoghi

Can ChatGPT evaluate research quality?
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating Research Quality with Large Language Models: An Analysis of ChatGPT's Effectiveness with Different Settings and Inputs
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Implicit and Explicit Research Quality Score Probabilities from ChatGPT
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Research evaluation with ChatGPT: Is it age, country, length, or field biased?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

In which fields do ChatGPT scores align better than citations with research quality?
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Estimating the quality of academic books from their descriptions with ChatGPT
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Which stylistic features fool ChatGPT research evaluations?
di: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Journal Quality Factors from ChatGPT: More meaningful than Impact Factors?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating the quality of published medical research with ChatGPT
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Evaluating the Predictive Capacity of ChatGPT for Academic Peer Review Outcomes Across Multiple Platforms
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

In which fields can ChatGPT detect journal article quality? An evaluation of REF2021 results
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Can ChatGPT evaluate research environments? Evidence from REF2021
di: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Can ChatGPT be a good follower of academic paradigms? Research quality evaluations in conflicting areas of sociology
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

How much are LLMs changing the language of academic papers after ChatGPT? A multi-database and full text analysis
di: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Assessing the societal influence of academic research with ChatGPT: Impact case study evaluations
di: Kousha, Kayvan, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Quantitative Methods in Research Evaluation Citation Indicators, Altmetrics, and Artificial Intelligence
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Can Smaller Large Language Models Evaluate Research Quality?
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Research quality evaluation by AI in the era of Large Language Models: Advantages, disadvantages, and systemic effects
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Is OpenAlex Suitable for Research Quality Evaluation and Which Citation Indicator is Best?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Prompt perturbation and fraction facilitation sometimes strengthen Large Language Model scores
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Do Large Language Models know Which Published Articles have been Retracted?
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Can Large Language Models Evaluate Grant Proposal Quality? Revisiting the Wennerås and Wold Peer Review Data
di: Sandström, Ulf, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Designing large language model prompts to extract scores from messy text: A shared dataset and challenge
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Will AI be overconfident about academic research findings when reliant on abstracts? (v1)
di: Thelwall, Mike
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Have LLM-associated terms increased in article full texts in all fields?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Can Small and Reasoning Large Language Models Score Journal Articles for Research Quality and Do Averaging and Few-shot Help?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

ChatGPT "contamination": estimating the prevalence of LLMs in the scholarly literature
di: Gray, Andrew
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Authority Signals in AI Cited Health Sources: A Framework for Evaluating Source Credibility in ChatGPT Responses
di: Jacques, Erin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

FAIR GPT: A virtual consultant for research data management in ChatGPT
di: Shigapov, Renat, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Large Language Models for Departmental Expert Review Quality Scores
di: Langfeldt, Liv, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2026)

Do male leading authors retract more articles than female leading authors?
di: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Delving into the Utilisation of ChatGPT in Scientific Publications in Astronomy
di: Astarita, Simone, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Is ChatGPT Transforming Academics' Writing Style?
di: Geng, Mingmeng, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Where there's a will there's a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited
di: Bao, Honglin, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Sentiment Analysis of Citations in Scientific Articles Using ChatGPT: Identifying Potential Biases and Conflicts of Interest
di: Hariri, Walid
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Can news and social media attention reduce the influence of problematic research?
di: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

An Experiment with the Use of ChatGPT for LCSH Subject Assignment on Electronic Theses and Dissertations
di: Chow, Eric H. C., et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

How is science discussed on Bluesky?
di: Zheng, Er-Te, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2025)

Quantifying Similarity: Text-Mining Approaches to Evaluate ChatGPT and Google Bard Content in Relation to BioMedical Literature
di: Klimczak, Jakub, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2024)

Which international co-authorships produce higher quality journal articles?
di: Thelwall, Mike, et al.
Pubblicazione: (2022)