A difference-in-differences estimator by covariate balancing propensity score

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Junjie, Matsushita, Yukitoshi
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866916879344336896
author Li, Junjie
Matsushita, Yukitoshi
author_facet Li, Junjie
Matsushita, Yukitoshi
contents This article develops a covariate balancing approach for the estimation of treatment effects on the treated (ATT) in a difference-in-differences (DID) research design when panel data are available. We show that the proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) DID estimator possesses several desirable properties: (i) local efficiency, (ii) double robustness in terms of consistency, (iii) double robustness in terms of inference, and (iv) faster convergence to the ATT compared to the augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) DID estimators when both working models are locally misspecified. These latter two characteristics set the CBPS DID estimator apart from the AIPW DID estimator theoretically. Simulation studies and an empirical study demonstrate the desirable finite sample performance of the proposed estimator.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_02097
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A difference-in-differences estimator by covariate balancing propensity score
Li, Junjie
Matsushita, Yukitoshi
Econometrics
This article develops a covariate balancing approach for the estimation of treatment effects on the treated (ATT) in a difference-in-differences (DID) research design when panel data are available. We show that the proposed covariate balancing propensity score (CBPS) DID estimator possesses several desirable properties: (i) local efficiency, (ii) double robustness in terms of consistency, (iii) double robustness in terms of inference, and (iv) faster convergence to the ATT compared to the augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) DID estimators when both working models are locally misspecified. These latter two characteristics set the CBPS DID estimator apart from the AIPW DID estimator theoretically. Simulation studies and an empirical study demonstrate the desirable finite sample performance of the proposed estimator.
title A difference-in-differences estimator by covariate balancing propensity score
topic Econometrics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02097