Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02483 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866915770879967232 |
|---|---|
| author | Pohlhausen, Jule Bitzer, Jörg |
| author_facet | Pohlhausen, Jule Bitzer, Jörg |
| contents | While audio recordings in real life provide insights into social dynamics and conversational behavior, they also raise concerns about the privacy of personal, sensitive data. This article explores the effectiveness of restricting recordings to low-frequency audio to protect spoken content. For resampling the audio signals to different sampling rates, we compare the effect of employing anti-aliasing filtering. Privacy enhancement is measured by an increased word error rate of automatic speech recognition models. The impact on utility performance is measured with voice activity detection models. Our experimental results show that for clean recordings, models trained with a sampling rate of up to 800 Hz transcribe the majority of words correctly. For both models, we analyzed the impact of the speaker's sex and pitch, and we demonstrated that missing anti-aliasing filters more strongly compromise speech privacy. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_02483 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Revisiting the Privacy of Low-Frequency Speech Signals: Exploring Resampling Methods, Evaluation Scenarios, and Speaker Characteristics Pohlhausen, Jule Bitzer, Jörg Audio and Speech Processing While audio recordings in real life provide insights into social dynamics and conversational behavior, they also raise concerns about the privacy of personal, sensitive data. This article explores the effectiveness of restricting recordings to low-frequency audio to protect spoken content. For resampling the audio signals to different sampling rates, we compare the effect of employing anti-aliasing filtering. Privacy enhancement is measured by an increased word error rate of automatic speech recognition models. The impact on utility performance is measured with voice activity detection models. Our experimental results show that for clean recordings, models trained with a sampling rate of up to 800 Hz transcribe the majority of words correctly. For both models, we analyzed the impact of the speaker's sex and pitch, and we demonstrated that missing anti-aliasing filters more strongly compromise speech privacy. |
| title | Revisiting the Privacy of Low-Frequency Speech Signals: Exploring Resampling Methods, Evaluation Scenarios, and Speaker Characteristics |
| topic | Audio and Speech Processing |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02483 |