Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02593 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866909721002246144 |
|---|---|
| author | Gomez, Catalina Seenivasan, Lalithkumar Zou, Xinrui Yoon, Jeewoo Chu, Sirui Leong, Ariel Kramer, Patrick Ku, Yu-Chun Porras, Jose L. Martin-Gomez, Alejandro Ishii, Masaru Unberath, Mathias |
| author_facet | Gomez, Catalina Seenivasan, Lalithkumar Zou, Xinrui Yoon, Jeewoo Chu, Sirui Leong, Ariel Kramer, Patrick Ku, Yu-Chun Porras, Jose L. Martin-Gomez, Alejandro Ishii, Masaru Unberath, Mathias |
| contents | Traditional surgical skill acquisition relies heavily on expert feedback, yet direct access is limited by faculty availability and variability in subjective assessments. While trainees can practice independently, the lack of personalized, objective, and quantitative feedback reduces the effectiveness of self-directed learning. Recent advances in computer vision and machine learning have enabled automated surgical skill assessment, demonstrating the feasibility of automatic competency evaluation. However, it is unclear whether such Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven feedback can contribute to skill acquisition. Here, we examine the effectiveness of explainable AI (XAI)-generated feedback in surgical training through a human-AI study. We create a simulation-based training framework that utilizes XAI to analyze videos and extract surgical skill proxies related to primitive actions. Our intervention provides automated, user-specific feedback by comparing trainee performance to expert benchmarks and highlighting deviations from optimal execution through understandable proxies for actionable guidance. In a prospective user study with medical students, we compare the impact of XAI-guided feedback against traditional video-based coaching on task outcomes, cognitive load, and trainees' perceptions of AI-assisted learning. Results showed improved cognitive load and confidence post-intervention. While no differences emerged between the two feedback types in reducing performance gaps or practice adjustments, trends in the XAI group revealed desirable effects where participants more closely mimicked expert practice. This work encourages the study of explainable AI in surgical education and the development of data-driven, adaptive feedback mechanisms that could transform learning experiences and competency assessment. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_02593 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Explainable AI for Automated User-specific Feedback in Surgical Skill Acquisition Gomez, Catalina Seenivasan, Lalithkumar Zou, Xinrui Yoon, Jeewoo Chu, Sirui Leong, Ariel Kramer, Patrick Ku, Yu-Chun Porras, Jose L. Martin-Gomez, Alejandro Ishii, Masaru Unberath, Mathias Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence Traditional surgical skill acquisition relies heavily on expert feedback, yet direct access is limited by faculty availability and variability in subjective assessments. While trainees can practice independently, the lack of personalized, objective, and quantitative feedback reduces the effectiveness of self-directed learning. Recent advances in computer vision and machine learning have enabled automated surgical skill assessment, demonstrating the feasibility of automatic competency evaluation. However, it is unclear whether such Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven feedback can contribute to skill acquisition. Here, we examine the effectiveness of explainable AI (XAI)-generated feedback in surgical training through a human-AI study. We create a simulation-based training framework that utilizes XAI to analyze videos and extract surgical skill proxies related to primitive actions. Our intervention provides automated, user-specific feedback by comparing trainee performance to expert benchmarks and highlighting deviations from optimal execution through understandable proxies for actionable guidance. In a prospective user study with medical students, we compare the impact of XAI-guided feedback against traditional video-based coaching on task outcomes, cognitive load, and trainees' perceptions of AI-assisted learning. Results showed improved cognitive load and confidence post-intervention. While no differences emerged between the two feedback types in reducing performance gaps or practice adjustments, trends in the XAI group revealed desirable effects where participants more closely mimicked expert practice. This work encourages the study of explainable AI in surgical education and the development of data-driven, adaptive feedback mechanisms that could transform learning experiences and competency assessment. |
| title | Explainable AI for Automated User-specific Feedback in Surgical Skill Acquisition |
| topic | Human-Computer Interaction Artificial Intelligence |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02593 |