:: Library Catalog

Cover Image

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Li, Shengqi, Gupta, Amarnath
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Computation and Language Artificial Intelligence
Online Access:	https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.02931
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Generating High Quality Synthetic Data for Dutch Medical Conversations
by: Kuan, Cecilia, et al.
Published: (2026)

OSVBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Specification Generation Tasks for Operating System Verification
by: Li, Shangyu, et al.
Published: (2025)

MISCON: A Mission-Driven Conversational Consultant for Pre-Venture Entrepreneurs in Food Deserts
by: Dasgupta, Subhasis, et al.
Published: (2025)

Actionable Conversational Quality Indicators for Improving Task-Oriented Dialog Systems
by: Higgins, Michael, et al.
Published: (2021)

What We Talk About When We Talk About LMs: Implicit Paradigm Shifts and the Ship of Language Models
by: Zhu, Shengqi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Exploring Design Choices for Building Language-Specific LLMs
by: Tejaswi, Atula, et al.
Published: (2024)

LLMs and Memorization: On Quality and Specificity of Copyright Compliance
by: Mueller, Felix B, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can LLMs Refuse Questions They Do Not Know? Measuring Knowledge-Aware Refusal in Factual Tasks
by: Pan, Wenbo, et al.
Published: (2025)

Reading between the Lines: Can LLMs Identify Cross-Cultural Communication Gaps?
by: Saha, Sougata, et al.
Published: (2025)

Dialogue You Can Trust: Human and AI Perspectives on Generated Conversations
by: Ebubechukwu, Ike, et al.
Published: (2024)

MedMT-Bench: Can LLMs Memorize and Understand Long Multi-Turn Conversations in Medical Scenarios?
by: Yang, Lin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Can Large Language Models Generate Effective Datasets for Emotion Recognition in Conversations?
by: Kaplan, Burak Can, et al.
Published: (2025)

Quality-Conditioned Agreement in Automated Short Answer Scoring: Mid-Range Degradation and the Impact of Task-Specific Adaptation
by: Schleifer, Abigail Victoria Gurin, et al.
Published: (2026)

GneissWeb: Preparing High Quality Data for LLMs at Scale
by: Gohari, Hajar Emami, et al.
Published: (2025)

Provable Benefits of Task-Specific Prompts for In-context Learning
by: Chang, Xiangyu, et al.
Published: (2025)

Identifying High-Confidence Social Biases in LLMs for Trustworthy Conversational Tutoring Agents
by: Alvarez, Aitor Arronte, et al.
Published: (2026)

Can LLMs Generate Visualizations with Dataless Prompts?
by: Coelho, Darius, et al.
Published: (2024)

Strategic Prompting for Conversational Tasks: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models Across Diverse Conversational Tasks
by: Joshi, Ratnesh Kumar, et al.
Published: (2024)

Large-Scale Constraint Generation -- Can LLMs Parse Hundreds of Constraints?
by: Boffa, Matteo, et al.
Published: (2025)

Beyond Captioning: Task-Specific Prompting for Improved VLM Performance in Mathematical Reasoning
by: Singh, Ayush, et al.
Published: (2024)

Pitfalls of Conversational LLMs on News Debiasing
by: Schlicht, Ipek Baris, et al.
Published: (2024)

Outlier Dimensions Encode Task-Specific Knowledge
by: Rudman, William, et al.
Published: (2023)

The Battle of LLMs: A Comparative Study in Conversational QA Tasks
by: Rangapur, Aryan, et al.
Published: (2024)

Leveraging Machine-Generated Rationales to Facilitate Social Meaning Detection in Conversations
by: Dutt, Ritam, et al.
Published: (2024)

Conversation Kernels: A Flexible Mechanism to Learn Relevant Context for Online Conversation Understanding
by: Agarwal, Vibhor, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can LLMs Infer Conversational Agent Users' Personality Traits from Chat History?
by: Cögendez, Derya, et al.
Published: (2026)

Adversarial Attacks and Defense for Conversation Entailment Task
by: Yang, Zhenning, et al.
Published: (2024)

Structured Thinking Matters: Improving LLMs Generalization in Causal Inference Tasks
by: Sun, Wentao, et al.
Published: (2025)

Enough Coin Flips Can Make LLMs Act Bayesian
by: Gupta, Ritwik, et al.
Published: (2025)

Qworld: Question-Specific Evaluation Criteria for LLMs
by: Gao, Shanghua, et al.
Published: (2026)

PANDA: Preference Adaptation for Enhancing Domain-Specific Abilities of LLMs
by: Liu, An, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can LLMs Ask Good Questions?
by: Zhang, Yueheng, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can LLMs Explain Themselves Counterfactually?
by: Dehghanighobadi, Zahra, et al.
Published: (2025)

Can GNN be Good Adapter for LLMs?
by: Huang, Xuanwen, et al.
Published: (2024)

Can LLMs Capture Human Preferences?
by: Goli, Ali, et al.
Published: (2023)

Can LLMs Speak For Diverse People? Tuning LLMs via Debate to Generate Controllable Controversial Statements
by: Li, Ming, et al.
Published: (2024)

All-in-One Tuning and Structural Pruning for Domain-Specific LLMs
by: Lu, Lei, et al.
Published: (2024)

Conversational Process Modeling: Can Generative AI Empower Domain Experts in Creating and Redesigning Process Models?
by: Klievtsova, Nataliia, et al.
Published: (2023)

Task-Specific Knowledge Distillation via Intermediate Probes
by: Brown, Ryan, et al.
Published: (2026)

AnyTaskTune: Advanced Domain-Specific Solutions through Task-Fine-Tuning
by: Cui, Jiaxi, et al.
Published: (2024)