Deciding how to respond: A deliberative framework to guide policymaker responses to AI systems

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fourie, Willem
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866918143588302848
author Fourie, Willem
author_facet Fourie, Willem
contents The discourse on responsible artificial intelligence (AI) regulation is understandably dominated by risk-focused assessments and analyses. This approach reflects the fundamental uncertainty policymakers face when determining appropriate responses to current, emerging and novel AI systems. In this article, we argue that by operationalising the concept of freedom - the philosophical counterpart to responsibility - a complementary approach centred on the potential societal benefits of AI systems can be developed. The result is a discursive framework grounded in freedom as capability and freedom as opportunity, which represent the two main intellectual traditions of interpreting freedom. We contend that the complexity, ambiguity and contestation involved in regulating AI systems make a deliberative paradigm more useful than the conventional technical one. The resulting framework is structured around coordinative, communicative and decision spaces, each with sequential focal points and associated outputs.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_03666
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Deciding how to respond: A deliberative framework to guide policymaker responses to AI systems
Fourie, Willem
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Emerging Technologies
The discourse on responsible artificial intelligence (AI) regulation is understandably dominated by risk-focused assessments and analyses. This approach reflects the fundamental uncertainty policymakers face when determining appropriate responses to current, emerging and novel AI systems. In this article, we argue that by operationalising the concept of freedom - the philosophical counterpart to responsibility - a complementary approach centred on the potential societal benefits of AI systems can be developed. The result is a discursive framework grounded in freedom as capability and freedom as opportunity, which represent the two main intellectual traditions of interpreting freedom. We contend that the complexity, ambiguity and contestation involved in regulating AI systems make a deliberative paradigm more useful than the conventional technical one. The resulting framework is structured around coordinative, communicative and decision spaces, each with sequential focal points and associated outputs.
title Deciding how to respond: A deliberative framework to guide policymaker responses to AI systems
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Emerging Technologies
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.03666