VER-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Reasoning with Fine-Grained Visual Evidence

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Qiang, Chenhui, Wei, Zhaoyang, Han, Xumeng, Wang, Zipeng, Li, Siyao, Lan, Xiangyuan, Jiao, Jianbin, Han, Zhenjun
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866909803764252672
author Qiang, Chenhui
Wei, Zhaoyang
Han, Xumeng
Wang, Zipeng
Li, Siyao
Lan, Xiangyuan
Jiao, Jianbin
Han, Zhenjun
author_facet Qiang, Chenhui
Wei, Zhaoyang
Han, Xumeng
Wang, Zipeng
Li, Siyao
Lan, Xiangyuan
Jiao, Jianbin
Han, Zhenjun
contents With the rapid development of MLLMs, evaluating their visual capabilities has become increasingly crucial. Current benchmarks primarily fall into two main types: basic perception benchmarks, which focus on local details but lack deep reasoning (e.g., "what is in the image?"), and mainstream reasoning benchmarks, which concentrate on prominent image elements but may fail to assess subtle clues requiring intricate analysis. However, profound visual understanding and complex reasoning depend more on interpreting subtle, inconspicuous local details than on perceiving salient, macro-level objects. These details, though occupying minimal image area, often contain richer, more critical information for robust analysis. To bridge this gap, we introduce the VER-Bench, a novel framework to evaluate MLLMs' ability to: 1) identify fine-grained visual clues, often occupying on average just 0.25% of the image area; 2) integrate these clues with world knowledge for complex reasoning. Comprising 374 carefully designed questions across Geospatial, Temporal, Situational, Intent, System State, and Symbolic reasoning, each question in VER-Bench is accompanied by structured evidence: visual clues and question-related reasoning derived from them. VER-Bench reveals current models' limitations in extracting subtle visual evidence and constructing evidence-based arguments, highlighting the need to enhance models's capabilities in fine-grained visual evidence extraction, integration, and reasoning for genuine visual understanding and human-like analysis. Dataset and additional materials are available https://github.com/verbta/ACMMM-25-Materials.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_04852
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle VER-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Reasoning with Fine-Grained Visual Evidence
Qiang, Chenhui
Wei, Zhaoyang
Han, Xumeng
Wang, Zipeng
Li, Siyao
Lan, Xiangyuan
Jiao, Jianbin
Han, Zhenjun
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
With the rapid development of MLLMs, evaluating their visual capabilities has become increasingly crucial. Current benchmarks primarily fall into two main types: basic perception benchmarks, which focus on local details but lack deep reasoning (e.g., "what is in the image?"), and mainstream reasoning benchmarks, which concentrate on prominent image elements but may fail to assess subtle clues requiring intricate analysis. However, profound visual understanding and complex reasoning depend more on interpreting subtle, inconspicuous local details than on perceiving salient, macro-level objects. These details, though occupying minimal image area, often contain richer, more critical information for robust analysis. To bridge this gap, we introduce the VER-Bench, a novel framework to evaluate MLLMs' ability to: 1) identify fine-grained visual clues, often occupying on average just 0.25% of the image area; 2) integrate these clues with world knowledge for complex reasoning. Comprising 374 carefully designed questions across Geospatial, Temporal, Situational, Intent, System State, and Symbolic reasoning, each question in VER-Bench is accompanied by structured evidence: visual clues and question-related reasoning derived from them. VER-Bench reveals current models' limitations in extracting subtle visual evidence and constructing evidence-based arguments, highlighting the need to enhance models's capabilities in fine-grained visual evidence extraction, integration, and reasoning for genuine visual understanding and human-like analysis. Dataset and additional materials are available https://github.com/verbta/ACMMM-25-Materials.
title VER-Bench: Evaluating MLLMs on Reasoning with Fine-Grained Visual Evidence
topic Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.04852