Generative AI and the Future of the Digital Commons: Five Open Questions and Knowledge Gaps
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866918119483637760 |
|---|---|
| author | Noroozian, Arman Aldana, Lorena Arisi, Marta Asghari, Hadi Avila, Renata Bizzaro, Pietro Giovanni Chandrasekhar, Ramya Consonni, Cristian De Angelis, Deborah De Chiara, Francesca del Rio-Chanona, Maria de Rosnay, Melanie Dulong Eriksson, Maria Font, Frederic Gomez, Emilia Guillier, Valérian Gutermuth, Lisa Hartmann, David Kaffee, Lucie-Aimée Keller, Paul Stalder, Felix Vinagre, Joao Vrandečić, Denny Wasielewski, Amanda |
| author_facet | Noroozian, Arman Aldana, Lorena Arisi, Marta Asghari, Hadi Avila, Renata Bizzaro, Pietro Giovanni Chandrasekhar, Ramya Consonni, Cristian De Angelis, Deborah De Chiara, Francesca del Rio-Chanona, Maria de Rosnay, Melanie Dulong Eriksson, Maria Font, Frederic Gomez, Emilia Guillier, Valérian Gutermuth, Lisa Hartmann, David Kaffee, Lucie-Aimée Keller, Paul Stalder, Felix Vinagre, Joao Vrandečić, Denny Wasielewski, Amanda |
| contents | The rapid advancement of Generative AI (GenAI) relies heavily on the digital commons, a vast collection of free and open online content that is created, shared, and maintained by communities. However, this relationship is becoming increasingly strained due to financial burdens, decreased contributions, and misalignment between AI models and community norms. As we move deeper into the GenAI era, it is essential to examine the interdependent relationship between GenAI, the long-term sustainability of the digital commons, and the equity of current AI development practices. We highlight five critical questions that require urgent attention: 1. How can we prevent the digital commons from being threatened by undersupply as individuals cease contributing to the commons and turn to Generative AI for information? 2. How can we mitigate the risk of the open web closing due to restrictions on access to curb AI crawlers? 3. How can technical standards and legal frameworks be updated to reflect the evolving needs of organizations hosting common content? 4. What are the effects of increased synthetic content in open knowledge databases, and how can we ensure their integrity? 5. How can we account for and distribute the infrastructural and environmental costs of providing data for AI training? We emphasize the need for more responsible practices in AI development, recognizing the digital commons not only as content but as a collaborative and decentralized form of knowledge governance, which relies on the practice of "commoning" - making, maintaining, and protecting shared and open resources. Ultimately, our goal is to stimulate discussion and research on the intersection of Generative AI and the digital commons, with the aim of developing an "AI commons" and public infrastructures for AI development that support the long-term health of the digital commons. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_06470 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Generative AI and the Future of the Digital Commons: Five Open Questions and Knowledge Gaps Noroozian, Arman Aldana, Lorena Arisi, Marta Asghari, Hadi Avila, Renata Bizzaro, Pietro Giovanni Chandrasekhar, Ramya Consonni, Cristian De Angelis, Deborah De Chiara, Francesca del Rio-Chanona, Maria de Rosnay, Melanie Dulong Eriksson, Maria Font, Frederic Gomez, Emilia Guillier, Valérian Gutermuth, Lisa Hartmann, David Kaffee, Lucie-Aimée Keller, Paul Stalder, Felix Vinagre, Joao Vrandečić, Denny Wasielewski, Amanda Computers and Society K.4.1; K.4.2; I.2.0 The rapid advancement of Generative AI (GenAI) relies heavily on the digital commons, a vast collection of free and open online content that is created, shared, and maintained by communities. However, this relationship is becoming increasingly strained due to financial burdens, decreased contributions, and misalignment between AI models and community norms. As we move deeper into the GenAI era, it is essential to examine the interdependent relationship between GenAI, the long-term sustainability of the digital commons, and the equity of current AI development practices. We highlight five critical questions that require urgent attention: 1. How can we prevent the digital commons from being threatened by undersupply as individuals cease contributing to the commons and turn to Generative AI for information? 2. How can we mitigate the risk of the open web closing due to restrictions on access to curb AI crawlers? 3. How can technical standards and legal frameworks be updated to reflect the evolving needs of organizations hosting common content? 4. What are the effects of increased synthetic content in open knowledge databases, and how can we ensure their integrity? 5. How can we account for and distribute the infrastructural and environmental costs of providing data for AI training? We emphasize the need for more responsible practices in AI development, recognizing the digital commons not only as content but as a collaborative and decentralized form of knowledge governance, which relies on the practice of "commoning" - making, maintaining, and protecting shared and open resources. Ultimately, our goal is to stimulate discussion and research on the intersection of Generative AI and the digital commons, with the aim of developing an "AI commons" and public infrastructures for AI development that support the long-term health of the digital commons. |
| title | Generative AI and the Future of the Digital Commons: Five Open Questions and Knowledge Gaps |
| topic | Computers and Society K.4.1; K.4.2; I.2.0 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06470 |