Salvato in:
| Autore principale: | |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06897 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866911100435431424 |
|---|---|
| author | Trlifajová, Kateřina |
| author_facet | Trlifajová, Kateřina |
| contents | Although Bolzano's concept of the continuum has gradually evolved, the basis remained the same: the continuum as an infinite class of points arranged in such a way that the so-called \emph{Bolzano completeness} holds. Bolzano realized over time that the central role of a general comprehension of continuum plays in its arithmetic description and constructed his measurable numbers. Their interpretations in the standard and non-standard models of real numbers clarify their relationship and also suggest why Bolzano did not base his theory of functions on infinitesimal numbers. The three main theorems on measurable numbers are various forms of their completeness. I argue why the second one is indeed the \emph{Supremum Theorem} and that an important corollary of the third one is a proof of the \emph{Bolzano completeness}. Only when the notion of continuum was supported by measurable numbers could Bolzano, in his last book, \emph{Paradoxes of the Infinite}, confidently defend the general properties of the continuum and reject the paradoxes associated with them. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_06897 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Bernard Bolzano: from Topological to Arithmetical Continuum and Back Again Trlifajová, Kateřina History and Overview Although Bolzano's concept of the continuum has gradually evolved, the basis remained the same: the continuum as an infinite class of points arranged in such a way that the so-called \emph{Bolzano completeness} holds. Bolzano realized over time that the central role of a general comprehension of continuum plays in its arithmetic description and constructed his measurable numbers. Their interpretations in the standard and non-standard models of real numbers clarify their relationship and also suggest why Bolzano did not base his theory of functions on infinitesimal numbers. The three main theorems on measurable numbers are various forms of their completeness. I argue why the second one is indeed the \emph{Supremum Theorem} and that an important corollary of the third one is a proof of the \emph{Bolzano completeness}. Only when the notion of continuum was supported by measurable numbers could Bolzano, in his last book, \emph{Paradoxes of the Infinite}, confidently defend the general properties of the continuum and reject the paradoxes associated with them. |
| title | Bernard Bolzano: from Topological to Arithmetical Continuum and Back Again |
| topic | History and Overview |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06897 |