WideSearch: Benchmarking Agentic Broad Info-Seeking

Fuente: arXiv
Enregistré dans:
Détails bibliographiques
Auteurs principaux: Wong, Ryan, Wang, Jiawei, Zhao, Junjie, Chen, Li, Gao, Yan, Zhang, Long, Zhou, Xuan, Wang, Zuo, Xiang, Kai, Zhang, Ge, Huang, Wenhao, Wang, Yang, Wang, Ke
Format: Preprint
Publié: 2025
Sujets:
Accès en ligne:
Tags: Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
_version_ 1866918131747782656
author Wong, Ryan
Wang, Jiawei
Zhao, Junjie
Chen, Li
Gao, Yan
Zhang, Long
Zhou, Xuan
Wang, Zuo
Xiang, Kai
Zhang, Ge
Huang, Wenhao
Wang, Yang
Wang, Ke
author_facet Wong, Ryan
Wang, Jiawei
Zhao, Junjie
Chen, Li
Gao, Yan
Zhang, Long
Zhou, Xuan
Wang, Zuo
Xiang, Kai
Zhang, Ge
Huang, Wenhao
Wang, Yang
Wang, Ke
contents From professional research to everyday planning, many tasks are bottlenecked by wide-scale information seeking, which is more repetitive than cognitively complex. With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), automated search agents powered by LLMs offer a promising solution to liberate humans from this tedious work. However, the capability of these agents to perform such "wide-context" collection reliably and completely remains largely unevaluated due to a lack of suitable benchmarks. To bridge this gap, we introduce WideSearch, a new benchmark engineered to evaluate agent reliability on these large-scale collection tasks. The benchmark features 200 manually curated questions (100 in English, 100 in Chinese) from over 15 diverse domains, grounded in real user queries. Each task requires agents to collect large-scale atomic information, which could be verified one by one objectively, and arrange it into a well-organized output. A rigorous five-stage quality control pipeline ensures the difficulty, completeness, and verifiability of the dataset. We benchmark over 10 state-of-the-art agentic search systems, including single-agent, multi-agent frameworks, and end-to-end commercial systems. Most systems achieve overall success rates near 0\%, with the best performer reaching just 5\%. However, given sufficient time, cross-validation by multiple human testers can achieve a near 100\% success rate. These results demonstrate that present search agents have critical deficiencies in large-scale information seeking, underscoring urgent areas for future research and development in agentic search. Our dataset, evaluation pipeline, and benchmark results have been publicly released at https://widesearch-seed.github.io/
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_07999
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle WideSearch: Benchmarking Agentic Broad Info-Seeking
Wong, Ryan
Wang, Jiawei
Zhao, Junjie
Chen, Li
Gao, Yan
Zhang, Long
Zhou, Xuan
Wang, Zuo
Xiang, Kai
Zhang, Ge
Huang, Wenhao
Wang, Yang
Wang, Ke
Computation and Language
From professional research to everyday planning, many tasks are bottlenecked by wide-scale information seeking, which is more repetitive than cognitively complex. With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), automated search agents powered by LLMs offer a promising solution to liberate humans from this tedious work. However, the capability of these agents to perform such "wide-context" collection reliably and completely remains largely unevaluated due to a lack of suitable benchmarks. To bridge this gap, we introduce WideSearch, a new benchmark engineered to evaluate agent reliability on these large-scale collection tasks. The benchmark features 200 manually curated questions (100 in English, 100 in Chinese) from over 15 diverse domains, grounded in real user queries. Each task requires agents to collect large-scale atomic information, which could be verified one by one objectively, and arrange it into a well-organized output. A rigorous five-stage quality control pipeline ensures the difficulty, completeness, and verifiability of the dataset. We benchmark over 10 state-of-the-art agentic search systems, including single-agent, multi-agent frameworks, and end-to-end commercial systems. Most systems achieve overall success rates near 0\%, with the best performer reaching just 5\%. However, given sufficient time, cross-validation by multiple human testers can achieve a near 100\% success rate. These results demonstrate that present search agents have critical deficiencies in large-scale information seeking, underscoring urgent areas for future research and development in agentic search. Our dataset, evaluation pipeline, and benchmark results have been publicly released at https://widesearch-seed.github.io/
title WideSearch: Benchmarking Agentic Broad Info-Seeking
topic Computation and Language
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.07999