Position: Beyond Sensitive Attributes, ML Fairness Should Quantify Structural Injustice via Social Determinants

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tang, Zeyu, London, Alex John, Kasirzadeh, Atoosa, de Ramirez, Sarah Stewart, Spirtes, Peter, Zhang, Kun, Koyejo, Sanmi
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866910272671711232
author Tang, Zeyu
London, Alex John
Kasirzadeh, Atoosa
de Ramirez, Sarah Stewart
Spirtes, Peter
Zhang, Kun
Koyejo, Sanmi
author_facet Tang, Zeyu
London, Alex John
Kasirzadeh, Atoosa
de Ramirez, Sarah Stewart
Spirtes, Peter
Zhang, Kun
Koyejo, Sanmi
contents Algorithmic fairness research has largely framed unfairness as discrimination along sensitive attributes. However, this approach limits visibility into unfairness as structural injustice instantiated through social determinants, which are contextual variables that shape attributes and outcomes without pertaining to specific individuals. This position paper argues that the field should quantify structural injustice via social determinants, beyond sensitive attributes. Drawing on cross-disciplinary insights, we argue that prevailing technical paradigms fail to adequately capture unfairness as structural injustice, because contexts are potentially treated as noise to be normalized rather than signal to be audited. We further demonstrate the practical urgency of this shift through a theoretical model of college admissions, a demographic study using U.S. census data, and a high-stakes domain application regarding breast cancer screening within an integrated U.S. healthcare system. Our results indicate that mitigation strategies centered solely on sensitive attributes can introduce new forms of structural injustice. We contend that auditing structural injustice through social determinants must precede mitigation, and call for new technical developments that move beyond sensitive-attribute-centered notions of fairness as non-discrimination.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_08337
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Position: Beyond Sensitive Attributes, ML Fairness Should Quantify Structural Injustice via Social Determinants
Tang, Zeyu
London, Alex John
Kasirzadeh, Atoosa
de Ramirez, Sarah Stewart
Spirtes, Peter
Zhang, Kun
Koyejo, Sanmi
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
Algorithmic fairness research has largely framed unfairness as discrimination along sensitive attributes. However, this approach limits visibility into unfairness as structural injustice instantiated through social determinants, which are contextual variables that shape attributes and outcomes without pertaining to specific individuals. This position paper argues that the field should quantify structural injustice via social determinants, beyond sensitive attributes. Drawing on cross-disciplinary insights, we argue that prevailing technical paradigms fail to adequately capture unfairness as structural injustice, because contexts are potentially treated as noise to be normalized rather than signal to be audited. We further demonstrate the practical urgency of this shift through a theoretical model of college admissions, a demographic study using U.S. census data, and a high-stakes domain application regarding breast cancer screening within an integrated U.S. healthcare system. Our results indicate that mitigation strategies centered solely on sensitive attributes can introduce new forms of structural injustice. We contend that auditing structural injustice through social determinants must precede mitigation, and call for new technical developments that move beyond sensitive-attribute-centered notions of fairness as non-discrimination.
title Position: Beyond Sensitive Attributes, ML Fairness Should Quantify Structural Injustice via Social Determinants
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
Machine Learning
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.08337