Cover Image

Improving Merge Pipeline Throughput in Continuous Integration via Pull Request Prioritization

Fuente: arXiv

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Jungwirth, Maximilian, Gruber, Martin, Fraser, Gordon
Format:	Preprint
Published:	2025
Subjects:	Software Engineering
Online Access:	Acceder al recurso
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

Similar Items

Practical Pipeline-Aware Regression Test Optimization for Continuous Integration
by: Schwendner, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2025)

Why Are Agentic Pull Requests Merged or Rejected? An Empirical Study
by: Peralta, Sien Reeve O., et al.
Published: (2026)

An IDE Plugin for Gamified Continuous Integration
by: Straubinger, Philipp, et al.
Published: (2024)

Analyzing GitHub Issues and Pull Requests in nf-core Pipelines: Insights into nf-core Pipeline Repositories
by: Alam, Khairul, et al.
Published: (2026)

Let's Make Every Pull Request Meaningful: An Empirical Analysis of Developer and Agentic Pull Requests
by: Yoshioka, Haruhiko, et al.
Published: (2026)

Gamifying a Software Testing Course with Continuous Integration
by: Straubinger, Philipp, et al.
Published: (2024)

The Value of Effective Pull Request Description
by: Pirouzkhah, Shirin, et al.
Published: (2026)

Beyond Bug Fixes: An Empirical Investigation of Post-Merge Code Quality Issues in Agent-Generated Pull Requests
by: Cynthia, Shamse Tasnim, et al.
Published: (2026)

Humans Integrate, Agents Fix: How Agent-Authored Pull Requests Are Referenced in Practice
by: Khemissi, Islem, et al.
Published: (2026)

Empirical Analysis of Pull Requests for Google Summer of Code
by: Popoola, Saheed
Published: (2024)

GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)

Insights into Security-Related AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Rabbi, Md Fazle, et al.
Published: (2026)

The Impact of Documentation on Test Engagement in Pull Requests in OSS
by: Amore, Teal, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Study of Library Usage in Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Twist, Lukas, et al.
Published: (2025)

The Quiet Contributions: Insights into AI-Generated Silent Pull Requests
by: Hasan, S M Mahedy, et al.
Published: (2026)

On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)

How Do Developers Use Code Suggestions in Pull Request Reviews?
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)

Evaluating the Impact of Data Cleaning on the Quality of Generated Pull Request Descriptions
by: Tire, Kutay, et al.
Published: (2025)

Generative AI for Pull Request Descriptions: Adoption, Impact, and Developer Interventions
by: Xiao, Tao, et al.
Published: (2024)

Change And Cover: Last-Mile, Pull Request-Based Regression Test Augmentation
by: Zhou, Zitong, et al.
Published: (2026)

Learning to Commit: Generating Organic Pull Requests via Online Repository Memory
by: Li, Mo, et al.
Published: (2026)

What Developers Ask to ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests? an Exploratory Study
by: Silva, Julyanara R., et al.
Published: (2025)

On the Footprints of Reviewer Bots Feedback on Agentic Pull Requests in OSS GitHub Repositories
by: Fatima, Syeda Kaneez, et al.
Published: (2026)

Comparing AI Coding Agents: A Task-Stratified Analysis of Pull Request Acceptance
by: Pinna, Giovanni, et al.
Published: (2026)

Human-Agent versus Human Pull Requests: A Testing-Focused Characterization and Comparison
by: Milanese, Roberto, et al.
Published: (2026)

Quality Gatekeepers: Investigating the Effects ofCode Review Bots on Pull Request Activities
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2021)

An Empirical Study on the Amount of Changes Required for Merge Request Acceptance
by: Kansab, Samah, et al.
Published: (2025)

Sphinx: Benchmarking and Modeling for LLM-Driven Pull Request Review
by: Zhang, Daoan, et al.
Published: (2026)

MELT: Mining Effective Lightweight Transformations from Pull Requests
by: Ramos, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2023)

Scalable and Accurate Test Case Prioritization in Continuous Integration Contexts
by: Yaraghi, Ahmadreza Saboor, et al.
Published: (2021)

These Aren't the Reviews You're Looking For How Humans Review AI-Generated Pull Requests
by: Duma, Kacper, et al.
Published: (2026)

From Industry Claims to Empirical Reality: An Empirical Study of Code Review Agents in Pull Requests
by: Chowdhury, Kowshik, et al.
Published: (2026)

Do Autonomous Agents Contribute Test Code? A Study of Tests in Agentic Pull Requests
by: Haque, Sabrina, et al.
Published: (2026)

An Empirical Study on Developers Shared Conversations with ChatGPT in GitHub Pull Requests and Issues
by: Hao, Huizi, et al.
Published: (2024)

Collaborator or Assistant? How AI Coding Agents Partition Work Across Pull Request Lifecycles
by: Jo, Young, et al.
Published: (2026)

Who Said CVE? How Vulnerability Identifiers Are Mentioned by Humans, Bots, and Agents in Pull Requests
by: Rooijendijk, Pien, et al.
Published: (2026)

Quality and Security Signals in AI-Generated Python Refactoring Pull Requests
by: Almukhtar, Mohamed, et al.
Published: (2026)

When AI Teammates Meet Code Review: Collaboration Signals Shaping the Integration of Agent-Authored Pull Requests
by: Nachuma, Costain, et al.
Published: (2026)

Commit-Aware Learning-Based Test Case Prioritization for Continuous Integration
by: Abbondante, Lorenzo, et al.
Published: (2026)

A Longitudinal Analysis of Good First Issue Practices and Newcomer Pull Requests in Popular OSS Projects
by: Hoshikawa, Hirotatsu, et al.
Published: (2026)