Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bayoumi, Noureldin, Schmitt, Robin, Raissi, Tina, Zeyer, Albert, Schlüter, Ralf, Ney, Hermann
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09880
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866909735984300032
author Bayoumi, Noureldin
Schmitt, Robin
Raissi, Tina
Zeyer, Albert
Schlüter, Ralf
Ney, Hermann
author_facet Bayoumi, Noureldin
Schmitt, Robin
Raissi, Tina
Zeyer, Albert
Schlüter, Ralf
Ney, Hermann
contents Combination approaches for speech recognition (ASR) systems cover structured sentence-level or word-based merging techniques as well as combination of model scores during beam search. In this work, we compare model combination across popular ASR architectures. Our method leverages the complementary strengths of different models in exploring diverse portions of the search space. We rescore a joint hypothesis list of two model candidates. We then identify the best hypothesis through log-linear combination of these sequence-level scores. While model combination during first-pass recognition may yield improved performance, it introduces variability due to differing decoding methods, making direct comparison more challenging. Our two-pass method ensures consistent comparisons across all system combination results presented in this study. We evaluate model pair candidates with varying architectures and label topologies and units. Experimental results are provided for the Librispeech 960h task.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_09880
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle A Comparative Analysis on ASR System Combination for Attention, CTC, Factored Hybrid, and Transducer Models
Bayoumi, Noureldin
Schmitt, Robin
Raissi, Tina
Zeyer, Albert
Schlüter, Ralf
Ney, Hermann
Sound
Combination approaches for speech recognition (ASR) systems cover structured sentence-level or word-based merging techniques as well as combination of model scores during beam search. In this work, we compare model combination across popular ASR architectures. Our method leverages the complementary strengths of different models in exploring diverse portions of the search space. We rescore a joint hypothesis list of two model candidates. We then identify the best hypothesis through log-linear combination of these sequence-level scores. While model combination during first-pass recognition may yield improved performance, it introduces variability due to differing decoding methods, making direct comparison more challenging. Our two-pass method ensures consistent comparisons across all system combination results presented in this study. We evaluate model pair candidates with varying architectures and label topologies and units. Experimental results are provided for the Librispeech 960h task.
title A Comparative Analysis on ASR System Combination for Attention, CTC, Factored Hybrid, and Transducer Models
topic Sound
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09880