Why Report Failed Interactions With Robots?! Towards Vignette-based Interaction Quality
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866918137196183552 |
|---|---|
| author | Axelsson, Agnes Reimann, Merle Cumbal, Ronald Pelikan, Hannah Lala, Divesh |
| author_facet | Axelsson, Agnes Reimann, Merle Cumbal, Ronald Pelikan, Hannah Lala, Divesh |
| contents | Although the quality of human-robot interactions has improved with the advent of LLMs, there are still various factors that cause systems to be sub-optimal when compared to human-human interactions. The nature and criticality of failures are often dependent on the context of the interaction and so cannot be generalized across the wide range of scenarios and experiments which have been implemented in HRI research. In this work we propose the use of a technique overlooked in the field of HRI, ethnographic vignettes, to clearly highlight these failures, particularly those that are rarely documented. We describe the methodology behind the process of writing vignettes and create our own based on our personal experiences with failures in HRI systems. We emphasize the strength of vignettes as the ability to communicate failures from a multi-disciplinary perspective, promote transparency about the capabilities of robots, and document unexpected behaviours which would otherwise be omitted from research reports. We encourage the use of vignettes to augment existing interaction evaluation methods. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_10603 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Why Report Failed Interactions With Robots?! Towards Vignette-based Interaction Quality Axelsson, Agnes Reimann, Merle Cumbal, Ronald Pelikan, Hannah Lala, Divesh Robotics Human-Computer Interaction Although the quality of human-robot interactions has improved with the advent of LLMs, there are still various factors that cause systems to be sub-optimal when compared to human-human interactions. The nature and criticality of failures are often dependent on the context of the interaction and so cannot be generalized across the wide range of scenarios and experiments which have been implemented in HRI research. In this work we propose the use of a technique overlooked in the field of HRI, ethnographic vignettes, to clearly highlight these failures, particularly those that are rarely documented. We describe the methodology behind the process of writing vignettes and create our own based on our personal experiences with failures in HRI systems. We emphasize the strength of vignettes as the ability to communicate failures from a multi-disciplinary perspective, promote transparency about the capabilities of robots, and document unexpected behaviours which would otherwise be omitted from research reports. We encourage the use of vignettes to augment existing interaction evaluation methods. |
| title | Why Report Failed Interactions With Robots?! Towards Vignette-based Interaction Quality |
| topic | Robotics Human-Computer Interaction |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10603 |