Salvato in:
| Autori principali: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Natura: | Preprint |
| Pubblicazione: |
2025
|
| Soggetti: | |
| Accesso online: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10873 |
| Tags: |
Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
|
| _version_ | 1866915446838525952 |
|---|---|
| author | Bellonzi, Nicole Cantin, Joshua T. Jangrouei, Mohammad Reza Kunitsa, Alexander Necaise, Jason Nguyen, Nam Penuel, John Radin, Maxwell D. Fontalvo, Jhonathan Romero Sundareswara, Rashmi Wang, Linjun Watts, Thomas Zhou, Yanbing Garrett, Michael C. Holmes, Adam Izmaylov, Artur F. Otten, Matthew |
| author_facet | Bellonzi, Nicole Cantin, Joshua T. Jangrouei, Mohammad Reza Kunitsa, Alexander Necaise, Jason Nguyen, Nam Penuel, John Radin, Maxwell D. Fontalvo, Jhonathan Romero Sundareswara, Rashmi Wang, Linjun Watts, Thomas Zhou, Yanbing Garrett, Michael C. Holmes, Adam Izmaylov, Artur F. Otten, Matthew |
| contents | Ground State Energy Estimation (GSEE) is a central problem in quantum chemistry and condensed matter physics, demanding efficient algorithms to solve complex electronic structure calculations. This work introduces a structured benchmarking framework for evaluating the performance of both classical and quantum solvers on diverse GSEE problem instances. We assess three prominent methods -- Semistochastic Heat-Bath Configuration Interaction (SHCI), Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG), and Double-Factorized Quantum Phase Estimation (DF QPE) -- ighlighting their respective strengths and limitations. Our results show that fully optimized SHCI achieves near-universal solvability on the benchmark set, DMRG excels for low-entanglement systems, and DF QPE is currently constrained by hardware and algorithmic limitations. However, we observe that many benchmark Hamiltonians are drawn from datasets tailored to SHCI and related approaches, introducing a bias that favors classical solvers. To mitigate this, we propose expanding the benchmark suite to include more challenging, strongly correlated systems to enable a more balanced and forward-looking evaluation of solver capabilities. As quantum hardware and algorithms improve, this benchmarking framework will serve as a vital tool for tracking progress and identifying domains where quantum methods may surpass classical techniques. The QB-GSEE benchmark repository is openly available at https://github.com/isi-usc-edu/qb-gsee-benchmark [1]. By maintaining a scalable and open resource, we aim to accelerate innovation in computational quantum chemistry and quantum computing. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_10873 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | QB Ground State Energy Estimation Benchmark Bellonzi, Nicole Cantin, Joshua T. Jangrouei, Mohammad Reza Kunitsa, Alexander Necaise, Jason Nguyen, Nam Penuel, John Radin, Maxwell D. Fontalvo, Jhonathan Romero Sundareswara, Rashmi Wang, Linjun Watts, Thomas Zhou, Yanbing Garrett, Michael C. Holmes, Adam Izmaylov, Artur F. Otten, Matthew Quantum Physics Ground State Energy Estimation (GSEE) is a central problem in quantum chemistry and condensed matter physics, demanding efficient algorithms to solve complex electronic structure calculations. This work introduces a structured benchmarking framework for evaluating the performance of both classical and quantum solvers on diverse GSEE problem instances. We assess three prominent methods -- Semistochastic Heat-Bath Configuration Interaction (SHCI), Density Matrix Renormalization Group (DMRG), and Double-Factorized Quantum Phase Estimation (DF QPE) -- ighlighting their respective strengths and limitations. Our results show that fully optimized SHCI achieves near-universal solvability on the benchmark set, DMRG excels for low-entanglement systems, and DF QPE is currently constrained by hardware and algorithmic limitations. However, we observe that many benchmark Hamiltonians are drawn from datasets tailored to SHCI and related approaches, introducing a bias that favors classical solvers. To mitigate this, we propose expanding the benchmark suite to include more challenging, strongly correlated systems to enable a more balanced and forward-looking evaluation of solver capabilities. As quantum hardware and algorithms improve, this benchmarking framework will serve as a vital tool for tracking progress and identifying domains where quantum methods may surpass classical techniques. The QB-GSEE benchmark repository is openly available at https://github.com/isi-usc-edu/qb-gsee-benchmark [1]. By maintaining a scalable and open resource, we aim to accelerate innovation in computational quantum chemistry and quantum computing. |
| title | QB Ground State Energy Estimation Benchmark |
| topic | Quantum Physics |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10873 |