Comparative Analysis of Two Astrometric Measuring Methods on Five Known Binaries

Fuente: arXiv
Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Malachi, Syfrett, John, Major, Gihan, Gamage
Format: Preprint
Veröffentlicht: 2025
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1866916902276694016
author Malachi, Syfrett
John, Major
Gihan, Gamage
author_facet Malachi, Syfrett
John, Major
Gihan, Gamage
contents Data on five Washington Double Star catalog binaries were collected from the Dimension Point Observatory (Mayhill, New Mexico) and Las Cumbres Observatory (Cerro Tololo, Chile) on February 19, 2025, and March 5, 2025, respectively. Student researchers participating in the Four Corners Research Seminar measured the position angle (theta/deg) and separation (rho/arcsec) of each target using AstroImageJ and an author-created script utilizing the Astropy module in Python3. Each target was imaged using a variety of instruments, filters, and exposure times. Compared to the extrapolated 6th Orbit Catalog estimates, measurements using AstroImageJ were within 1.52% of theta and 14.87% of rho, while the author's automated code method provided measurements within 4.09% of theta and 16.59% of rho.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_11777
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Comparative Analysis of Two Astrometric Measuring Methods on Five Known Binaries
Malachi, Syfrett
John, Major
Gihan, Gamage
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
Data on five Washington Double Star catalog binaries were collected from the Dimension Point Observatory (Mayhill, New Mexico) and Las Cumbres Observatory (Cerro Tololo, Chile) on February 19, 2025, and March 5, 2025, respectively. Student researchers participating in the Four Corners Research Seminar measured the position angle (theta/deg) and separation (rho/arcsec) of each target using AstroImageJ and an author-created script utilizing the Astropy module in Python3. Each target was imaged using a variety of instruments, filters, and exposure times. Compared to the extrapolated 6th Orbit Catalog estimates, measurements using AstroImageJ were within 1.52% of theta and 14.87% of rho, while the author's automated code method provided measurements within 4.09% of theta and 16.59% of rho.
title Comparative Analysis of Two Astrometric Measuring Methods on Five Known Binaries
topic Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Solar and Stellar Astrophysics
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.11777