Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stoltenberg, Catharina, Janvin, Matias, Stensrud, Mats Julius, Rosseland, Leiv Arne, Gran, Jon Michael
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13848
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866918127266168832
author Stoltenberg, Catharina
Janvin, Matias
Stensrud, Mats Julius
Rosseland, Leiv Arne
Gran, Jon Michael
author_facet Stoltenberg, Catharina
Janvin, Matias
Stensrud, Mats Julius
Rosseland, Leiv Arne
Gran, Jon Michael
contents Medical researchers and practitioners want to know if supplementing opioid treatments with other analgesics, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), can reduce opioid consumption. However, quantifying opioid-sparing effects is challenging; even coming up with a policy-relevant estimand requires care. We propose defining these effects in terms of add-on regimes. An add-on regime assigns NSAIDs over time based on the opioid and NSAID treatments a patient would naturally take without any intervention. The regime uses the physician's decision to administer opioids as a clinically meaningful, and practically feasible, indication for NSAID administration. In contrast, static regimes assign NSAIDs at predefined time points, regardless of clinical context. When opioids are not administered, the add-on regime requires no intervention, thereby preserving the natural level of NSAIDs. This differs from conventional dynamic regimes, which define treatment decisions at every time point during the treatment period. We identify the effect of add-on regimes under assumptions that are easier to assess than those used in existing methods. Finally, we apply the methods to estimate opioid-sparing effects of NSAIDs in a cohort of Norwegian trauma patients using national registry data.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_13848
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Add-On Regimes and Their Relevance for Quantifying the Effects of Opioid-Sparing Treatments
Stoltenberg, Catharina
Janvin, Matias
Stensrud, Mats Julius
Rosseland, Leiv Arne
Gran, Jon Michael
Applications
Medical researchers and practitioners want to know if supplementing opioid treatments with other analgesics, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), can reduce opioid consumption. However, quantifying opioid-sparing effects is challenging; even coming up with a policy-relevant estimand requires care. We propose defining these effects in terms of add-on regimes. An add-on regime assigns NSAIDs over time based on the opioid and NSAID treatments a patient would naturally take without any intervention. The regime uses the physician's decision to administer opioids as a clinically meaningful, and practically feasible, indication for NSAID administration. In contrast, static regimes assign NSAIDs at predefined time points, regardless of clinical context. When opioids are not administered, the add-on regime requires no intervention, thereby preserving the natural level of NSAIDs. This differs from conventional dynamic regimes, which define treatment decisions at every time point during the treatment period. We identify the effect of add-on regimes under assumptions that are easier to assess than those used in existing methods. Finally, we apply the methods to estimate opioid-sparing effects of NSAIDs in a cohort of Norwegian trauma patients using national registry data.
title Add-On Regimes and Their Relevance for Quantifying the Effects of Opioid-Sparing Treatments
topic Applications
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.13848