Who Sees What? Structured Thought-Action Sequences for Epistemic Reasoning in LLMs
Fuente:
arXiv
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2025
|
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| _version_ | 1866908496296935424 |
|---|---|
| author | Annese, Luca Patania, Sabrina Serino, Silvia Foulsham, Tom Rossi, Silvia Ruggeri, Azzurra Ognibene, Dimitri |
| author_facet | Annese, Luca Patania, Sabrina Serino, Silvia Foulsham, Tom Rossi, Silvia Ruggeri, Azzurra Ognibene, Dimitri |
| contents | Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and reasoning frameworks have opened new possibilities for improving the perspective -taking capabilities of autonomous agents. However, tasks that involve active perception, collaborative reasoning, and perspective taking (understanding what another agent can see or knows) pose persistent challenges for current LLM-based systems. This study investigates the potential of structured examples derived from transformed solution graphs generated by the Fast Downward planner to improve the performance of LLM-based agents within a ReAct framework. We propose a structured solution-processing pipeline that generates three distinct categories of examples: optimal goal paths (G-type), informative node paths (E-type), and step-by-step optimal decision sequences contrasting alternative actions (L-type). These solutions are further converted into ``thought-action'' examples by prompting an LLM to explicitly articulate the reasoning behind each decision. While L-type examples slightly reduce clarification requests and overall action steps, they do not yield consistent improvements. Agents are successful in tasks requiring basic attentional filtering but struggle in scenarios that required mentalising about occluded spaces or weighing the costs of epistemic actions. These findings suggest that structured examples alone are insufficient for robust perspective-taking, underscoring the need for explicit belief tracking, cost modelling, and richer environments to enable socially grounded collaboration in LLM-based agents. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_14564 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Who Sees What? Structured Thought-Action Sequences for Epistemic Reasoning in LLMs Annese, Luca Patania, Sabrina Serino, Silvia Foulsham, Tom Rossi, Silvia Ruggeri, Azzurra Ognibene, Dimitri Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Human-Computer Interaction I.2.9; I.2.10; I.2.7; J.4 Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) and reasoning frameworks have opened new possibilities for improving the perspective -taking capabilities of autonomous agents. However, tasks that involve active perception, collaborative reasoning, and perspective taking (understanding what another agent can see or knows) pose persistent challenges for current LLM-based systems. This study investigates the potential of structured examples derived from transformed solution graphs generated by the Fast Downward planner to improve the performance of LLM-based agents within a ReAct framework. We propose a structured solution-processing pipeline that generates three distinct categories of examples: optimal goal paths (G-type), informative node paths (E-type), and step-by-step optimal decision sequences contrasting alternative actions (L-type). These solutions are further converted into ``thought-action'' examples by prompting an LLM to explicitly articulate the reasoning behind each decision. While L-type examples slightly reduce clarification requests and overall action steps, they do not yield consistent improvements. Agents are successful in tasks requiring basic attentional filtering but struggle in scenarios that required mentalising about occluded spaces or weighing the costs of epistemic actions. These findings suggest that structured examples alone are insufficient for robust perspective-taking, underscoring the need for explicit belief tracking, cost modelling, and richer environments to enable socially grounded collaboration in LLM-based agents. |
| title | Who Sees What? Structured Thought-Action Sequences for Epistemic Reasoning in LLMs |
| topic | Artificial Intelligence Computation and Language Human-Computer Interaction I.2.9; I.2.10; I.2.7; J.4 |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14564 |