Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhong, Huixin, Liu, Yanan, Cao, Qi, Wang, Shijin, Ye, Zijing, Wang, Zimu, Zhang, Shiyao
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14918
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866908496717414400
author Zhong, Huixin
Liu, Yanan
Cao, Qi
Wang, Shijin
Ye, Zijing
Wang, Zimu
Zhang, Shiyao
author_facet Zhong, Huixin
Liu, Yanan
Cao, Qi
Wang, Shijin
Ye, Zijing
Wang, Zimu
Zhang, Shiyao
contents As large language models (LLMs) integrate into collaborative teams, their social conformity -- the tendency to align with majority opinions -- has emerged as a key concern. In humans, conformity arises from informational influence (rational use of group cues for accuracy) or normative influence (social pressure for approval), with uncertainty moderating this balance by shifting from purely analytical to heuristic processing. It remains unclear whether these human psychological mechanisms apply to LLMs. This study adapts the information cascade paradigm from behavioral economics to quantitatively disentangle the two drivers to investigate the moderate effect. We evaluated nine leading LLMs across three decision-making scenarios (medical, legal, investment), manipulating information uncertainty (q = 0.667, 0.55, and 0.70, respectively). Our results indicate that informational influence underpins the models' behavior across all contexts, with accuracy and confidence consistently rising with stronger evidence. However, this foundational mechanism is dramatically modulated by uncertainty. In low-to-medium uncertainty scenarios, this informational process is expressed as a conservative strategy, where LLMs systematically underweight all evidence sources. In contrast, high uncertainty triggers a critical shift: while still processing information, the models additionally exhibit a normative-like amplification, causing them to overweight public signals (beta > 1.55 vs. private beta = 0.81).
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_14918
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Disentangling the Drivers of LLM Social Conformity: An Uncertainty-Moderated Dual-Process Mechanism
Zhong, Huixin
Liu, Yanan
Cao, Qi
Wang, Shijin
Ye, Zijing
Wang, Zimu
Zhang, Shiyao
Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
As large language models (LLMs) integrate into collaborative teams, their social conformity -- the tendency to align with majority opinions -- has emerged as a key concern. In humans, conformity arises from informational influence (rational use of group cues for accuracy) or normative influence (social pressure for approval), with uncertainty moderating this balance by shifting from purely analytical to heuristic processing. It remains unclear whether these human psychological mechanisms apply to LLMs. This study adapts the information cascade paradigm from behavioral economics to quantitatively disentangle the two drivers to investigate the moderate effect. We evaluated nine leading LLMs across three decision-making scenarios (medical, legal, investment), manipulating information uncertainty (q = 0.667, 0.55, and 0.70, respectively). Our results indicate that informational influence underpins the models' behavior across all contexts, with accuracy and confidence consistently rising with stronger evidence. However, this foundational mechanism is dramatically modulated by uncertainty. In low-to-medium uncertainty scenarios, this informational process is expressed as a conservative strategy, where LLMs systematically underweight all evidence sources. In contrast, high uncertainty triggers a critical shift: while still processing information, the models additionally exhibit a normative-like amplification, causing them to overweight public signals (beta > 1.55 vs. private beta = 0.81).
title Disentangling the Drivers of LLM Social Conformity: An Uncertainty-Moderated Dual-Process Mechanism
topic Computers and Society
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14918