SurgWound-Bench: A Benchmark for Surgical Wound Diagnosis

Fuente: arXiv
Salvato in:
Dettagli Bibliografici
Autori principali: Xu, Jiahao, Yin, Changchang, Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas, Tsilimigras, Diamantis, Clear, Kevin, Yao, Bingsheng, Wang, Dakuo, Pawlik, Timothy, Zhang, Ping
Natura: Preprint
Pubblicazione: 2025
Soggetti:
Accesso online:
Tags: Aggiungi Tag
Nessun Tag, puoi essere il primo ad aggiungerne!!
_version_ 1866911114527244288
author Xu, Jiahao
Yin, Changchang
Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas
Tsilimigras, Diamantis
Clear, Kevin
Yao, Bingsheng
Wang, Dakuo
Pawlik, Timothy
Zhang, Ping
author_facet Xu, Jiahao
Yin, Changchang
Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas
Tsilimigras, Diamantis
Clear, Kevin
Yao, Bingsheng
Wang, Dakuo
Pawlik, Timothy
Zhang, Ping
contents Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common and costly healthcare-associated infections and and surgical wound care remains a significant clinical challenge in preventing SSIs and improving patient outcomes. While recent studies have explored the use of deep learning for preliminary surgical wound screening, progress has been hindered by concerns over data privacy and the high costs associated with expert annotation. Currently, no publicly available dataset or benchmark encompasses various types of surgical wounds, resulting in the absence of an open-source Surgical-Wound screening tool. To address this gap: (1) we present SurgWound, the first open-source dataset featuring a diverse array of surgical wound types. It contains 697 surgical wound images annotated by 3 professional surgeons with eight fine-grained clinical attributes. (2) Based on SurgWound, we introduce the first benchmark for surgical wound diagnosis, which includes visual question answering (VQA) and report generation tasks to comprehensively evaluate model performance. (3) Furthermore, we propose a three-stage learning framework, WoundQwen, for surgical wound diagnosis. In the first stage, we employ five independent MLLMs to accurately predict specific surgical wound characteristics. In the second stage, these predictions serve as additional knowledge inputs to two MLLMs responsible for diagnosing outcomes, which assess infection risk and guide subsequent interventions. In the third stage, we train a MLLM that integrates the diagnostic results from the previous two stages to produce a comprehensive report. This three-stage framework can analyze detailed surgical wound characteristics and provide subsequent instructions to patients based on surgical images, paving the way for personalized wound care, timely intervention, and improved patient outcomes.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_15189
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle SurgWound-Bench: A Benchmark for Surgical Wound Diagnosis
Xu, Jiahao
Yin, Changchang
Chatzipanagiotou, Odysseas
Tsilimigras, Diamantis
Clear, Kevin
Yao, Bingsheng
Wang, Dakuo
Pawlik, Timothy
Zhang, Ping
Artificial Intelligence
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Image and Video Processing
Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common and costly healthcare-associated infections and and surgical wound care remains a significant clinical challenge in preventing SSIs and improving patient outcomes. While recent studies have explored the use of deep learning for preliminary surgical wound screening, progress has been hindered by concerns over data privacy and the high costs associated with expert annotation. Currently, no publicly available dataset or benchmark encompasses various types of surgical wounds, resulting in the absence of an open-source Surgical-Wound screening tool. To address this gap: (1) we present SurgWound, the first open-source dataset featuring a diverse array of surgical wound types. It contains 697 surgical wound images annotated by 3 professional surgeons with eight fine-grained clinical attributes. (2) Based on SurgWound, we introduce the first benchmark for surgical wound diagnosis, which includes visual question answering (VQA) and report generation tasks to comprehensively evaluate model performance. (3) Furthermore, we propose a three-stage learning framework, WoundQwen, for surgical wound diagnosis. In the first stage, we employ five independent MLLMs to accurately predict specific surgical wound characteristics. In the second stage, these predictions serve as additional knowledge inputs to two MLLMs responsible for diagnosing outcomes, which assess infection risk and guide subsequent interventions. In the third stage, we train a MLLM that integrates the diagnostic results from the previous two stages to produce a comprehensive report. This three-stage framework can analyze detailed surgical wound characteristics and provide subsequent instructions to patients based on surgical images, paving the way for personalized wound care, timely intervention, and improved patient outcomes.
title SurgWound-Bench: A Benchmark for Surgical Wound Diagnosis
topic Artificial Intelligence
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Image and Video Processing
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15189