Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16593 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Table of Contents:
- Background: Accurately estimating volumetric water content (VWC) can greatly enhance the prediction of landslide risk. The standard approach involves using locally limited, invasive sensor measurements. Recently, however, electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has emerged as a cost-effective, minimally invasive, real-time, indirect method of monitoring VWC. However, linking ER to VWC poses distinct challenges. Purpose: Random forest models were developed to estimate and predict VWC from ER. Spatially and temporally heterogeneous measurements were conducted to improve robustness and accuracy. Methods: The models were trained using 370-500 ER sensor measurements at depths of 10, 50, 150 and 190 cm. Precipitation and air temperature with a depth-dependent impact delay were introduced to simulate infiltration. The models were then validated at various locations, and their predictive capabilities were examined. Results: Including precipitation and temperature as parameters reduced the mean absolute error (MAE) by between 7.3% and 73.0%, depending on the depth. However, not all outliers could be eliminated. Delaying the model parameter depth-dependently reduced the maximum relative error (MaRE) by 14.7-56.0% and the mean relative error (MRE) to below 2.8%. Observed uncertainties for the top meter remained fairly constant. A 24 h forecast revealed an MRE below 5% for all depths; however, outliers occurred more frequently. Nevertheless, models trained on data from one location failed to generalize to other locations. VWC tomography based on ERT revealed significant moisture bands at depths of one to two meters. Conclusion: VWC can be reliably predicted from ERT. However, validation of VWC from ERT in different locations revealed significant deficits. It is expected that an automated ERT training of models at various locations will eliminate these differences.