Integrative Prognostic Modeling of Breast Cancer Survival with Gene Expression and Clinical Data

Fuente: arXiv
Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amevor, Robert, Kubuafor, Emmanuel, Baidoo, Dennis, Salifu, Junaidu, Gonnage, Koshali Muthunama, Okeke, Onyedikachi Joshua
Formato: Preprint
Publicado: 2025
Materias:
Acceso en línea:
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
_version_ 1866912551167590400
author Amevor, Robert
Kubuafor, Emmanuel
Baidoo, Dennis
Salifu, Junaidu
Gonnage, Koshali Muthunama
Okeke, Onyedikachi Joshua
author_facet Amevor, Robert
Kubuafor, Emmanuel
Baidoo, Dennis
Salifu, Junaidu
Gonnage, Koshali Muthunama
Okeke, Onyedikachi Joshua
contents Background: Accurate survival prediction in breast cancer is essential for patient stratification and personalized therapy. Integrating gene expression data with clinical factors may enhance prognostic performance and support precision medicine. Objective: To develop an integrative survival prediction model combining clinical variables and gene expression signatures, and to assess their contributions using penalized Cox regression and machine learning. Methods: We analyzed 1,867 patients from the METABRIC cohort with clinical annotations and microarray-based gene expression profiles. The top 5,000 most variable genes were retained. Elastic Net-penalized Cox regression identified 75 predictors (70 genes and 5 clinical variables: tumor size, stage, surgery type, age at diagnosis, and Nottingham Prognostic Index). Model performance was evaluated with Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and 36-month time-dependent AUC. Random Survival Forests (RSF) trained on the top 20 genes assessed nonlinear effects and validated variable importance. PCA and heatmaps visualized gene expression patterns across risk groups. Results: The integrative Cox model achieved a C-index of 0.922 and a 36-month AUC of 0.94, outperforming clinical-only models (C=0.64). RSF confirmed the prognostic value of top genes (e.g., OR2T27, TBATA, LINC01165, SLC10A4), yielding a 36-month AUC of 0.88. Conclusions: Combining gene expression signatures with clinical variables substantially improves survival prediction in breast cancer and provides a framework for individualized prognostic assessment and clinical decision-making.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_16740
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle Integrative Prognostic Modeling of Breast Cancer Survival with Gene Expression and Clinical Data
Amevor, Robert
Kubuafor, Emmanuel
Baidoo, Dennis
Salifu, Junaidu
Gonnage, Koshali Muthunama
Okeke, Onyedikachi Joshua
Quantitative Methods
Background: Accurate survival prediction in breast cancer is essential for patient stratification and personalized therapy. Integrating gene expression data with clinical factors may enhance prognostic performance and support precision medicine. Objective: To develop an integrative survival prediction model combining clinical variables and gene expression signatures, and to assess their contributions using penalized Cox regression and machine learning. Methods: We analyzed 1,867 patients from the METABRIC cohort with clinical annotations and microarray-based gene expression profiles. The top 5,000 most variable genes were retained. Elastic Net-penalized Cox regression identified 75 predictors (70 genes and 5 clinical variables: tumor size, stage, surgery type, age at diagnosis, and Nottingham Prognostic Index). Model performance was evaluated with Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and 36-month time-dependent AUC. Random Survival Forests (RSF) trained on the top 20 genes assessed nonlinear effects and validated variable importance. PCA and heatmaps visualized gene expression patterns across risk groups. Results: The integrative Cox model achieved a C-index of 0.922 and a 36-month AUC of 0.94, outperforming clinical-only models (C=0.64). RSF confirmed the prognostic value of top genes (e.g., OR2T27, TBATA, LINC01165, SLC10A4), yielding a 36-month AUC of 0.88. Conclusions: Combining gene expression signatures with clinical variables substantially improves survival prediction in breast cancer and provides a framework for individualized prognostic assessment and clinical decision-making.
title Integrative Prognostic Modeling of Breast Cancer Survival with Gene Expression and Clinical Data
topic Quantitative Methods
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.16740