What Matters in Data for DPO?

Fuente: arXiv
Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pan, Yu, Cai, Zhongze, Chen, Guanting, Zhong, Huaiyang, Wang, Chonghuan
Format: Preprint
Published: 2025
Subjects:
Online Access:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
_version_ 1866917066463772672
author Pan, Yu
Cai, Zhongze
Chen, Guanting
Zhong, Huaiyang
Wang, Chonghuan
author_facet Pan, Yu
Cai, Zhongze
Chen, Guanting
Zhong, Huaiyang
Wang, Chonghuan
contents Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a simple and effective approach for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, bypassing the need for a learned reward model. Despite its growing adoption, a fundamental question remains open: what characteristics of preference data are most critical for DPO performance? In this work, we provide a systematic study of how preference data distribution influences DPO, from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. We show that the quality of chosen responses plays a dominant role in optimizing the DPO objective, while the quality of rejected responses may have relatively limited impact. Our theoretical analysis characterizes the optimal response distribution under DPO and reveals how contrastiveness between responses helps primarily by improving the chosen samples. We further study an online DPO setting and show it effectively reduces to supervised fine-tuning on the chosen responses. Extensive experiments across diverse tasks confirm our findings: improving the quality of chosen responses consistently boosts performance regardless of the quality of the rejected responses. We also investigate the benefit of mixing the on-policy data. Our results interpret the mechanism behind some widely adopted strategies and offer practical insights for constructing high-impact preference datasets for LLM alignment.
format Preprint
id arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_18312
institution arXiv
publishDate 2025
record_format arxiv
spellingShingle What Matters in Data for DPO?
Pan, Yu
Cai, Zhongze
Chen, Guanting
Zhong, Huaiyang
Wang, Chonghuan
Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a simple and effective approach for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences, bypassing the need for a learned reward model. Despite its growing adoption, a fundamental question remains open: what characteristics of preference data are most critical for DPO performance? In this work, we provide a systematic study of how preference data distribution influences DPO, from both theoretical and empirical perspectives. We show that the quality of chosen responses plays a dominant role in optimizing the DPO objective, while the quality of rejected responses may have relatively limited impact. Our theoretical analysis characterizes the optimal response distribution under DPO and reveals how contrastiveness between responses helps primarily by improving the chosen samples. We further study an online DPO setting and show it effectively reduces to supervised fine-tuning on the chosen responses. Extensive experiments across diverse tasks confirm our findings: improving the quality of chosen responses consistently boosts performance regardless of the quality of the rejected responses. We also investigate the benefit of mixing the on-policy data. Our results interpret the mechanism behind some widely adopted strategies and offer practical insights for constructing high-impact preference datasets for LLM alignment.
title What Matters in Data for DPO?
topic Machine Learning
Artificial Intelligence
url https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18312