Tracing Positional Bias in Financial Decision-Making: Mechanistic Insights from Qwen2.5
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| _version_ | 1866916994292383744 |
|---|---|
| author | Dimino, Fabrizio Saxena, Krati Sarmah, Bhaskarjit Pasquali, Stefano |
| author_facet | Dimino, Fabrizio Saxena, Krati Sarmah, Bhaskarjit Pasquali, Stefano |
| contents | The growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in finance exposes high-stakes decision-making to subtle, underexamined positional biases. The complexity and opacity of modern model architectures compound this risk. We present the first unified framework and benchmark that not only detects and quantifies positional bias in binary financial decisions but also pinpoints its mechanistic origins within open-source Qwen2.5-instruct models (1.5B-14B). Our empirical analysis covers a novel, finance-authentic dataset revealing that positional bias is pervasive, scale-sensitive, and prone to resurfacing under nuanced prompt designs and investment scenarios, with recency and primacy effects revealing new vulnerabilities in risk-laden contexts. Through transparent mechanistic interpretability, we map how and where bias emerges and propagates within the models to deliver actionable, generalizable insights across prompt types and scales. By bridging domain-specific audit with model interpretability, our work provides a new methodological standard for both rigorous bias diagnosis and practical mitigation, establishing essential guidance for responsible and trustworthy deployment of LLMs in financial systems. |
| format | Preprint |
| id |
arxiv_https___arxiv_org_abs_2508_18427 |
| institution | arXiv |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| record_format | arxiv |
| spellingShingle | Tracing Positional Bias in Financial Decision-Making: Mechanistic Insights from Qwen2.5 Dimino, Fabrizio Saxena, Krati Sarmah, Bhaskarjit Pasquali, Stefano Computational Finance Risk Management The growing adoption of large language models (LLMs) in finance exposes high-stakes decision-making to subtle, underexamined positional biases. The complexity and opacity of modern model architectures compound this risk. We present the first unified framework and benchmark that not only detects and quantifies positional bias in binary financial decisions but also pinpoints its mechanistic origins within open-source Qwen2.5-instruct models (1.5B-14B). Our empirical analysis covers a novel, finance-authentic dataset revealing that positional bias is pervasive, scale-sensitive, and prone to resurfacing under nuanced prompt designs and investment scenarios, with recency and primacy effects revealing new vulnerabilities in risk-laden contexts. Through transparent mechanistic interpretability, we map how and where bias emerges and propagates within the models to deliver actionable, generalizable insights across prompt types and scales. By bridging domain-specific audit with model interpretability, our work provides a new methodological standard for both rigorous bias diagnosis and practical mitigation, establishing essential guidance for responsible and trustworthy deployment of LLMs in financial systems. |
| title | Tracing Positional Bias in Financial Decision-Making: Mechanistic Insights from Qwen2.5 |
| topic | Computational Finance Risk Management |
| url | https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.18427 |