Does AI Code Review Lead to Code Changes? A Case Study of GitHub Actions
Fuente:
arXiv
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | Sun, Kexin, Kuang, Hongyu, Baltes, Sebastian, Zhou, Xin, Zhang, He, Ma, Xiaoxing, Rong, Guoping, Shao, Dong, Treude, Christoph |
|---|---|
| Format: | Preprint |
| Published: |
2025
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
Automated Code Review Assignments: An Alternative Perspective of Code Ownership on GitHub
by: Lulla, Jai Lal, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Lulla, Jai Lal, et al.
Published: (2025)
Prioritising GitHub Priority Labels
by: Caddy, James, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Caddy, James, et al.
Published: (2024)
GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)
Improving LLM-Based Go Code Review through Issue-List Generation and Context Augmentation
by: Sun, Kexin, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Sun, Kexin, et al.
Published: (2026)
"My GitHub Sponsors profile is live!" Investigating the Impact of Twitter/X Mentions on GitHub Sponsors
by: Fan, Youmei, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Fan, Youmei, et al.
Published: (2024)
Fingerprinting AI Coding Agents on GitHub
by: Ghaleb, Taher A.
Published: (2026)
by: Ghaleb, Taher A.
Published: (2026)
How Do Software Developers Use GitHub Actions to Automate Their Workflows?
by: Kinsman, Timothy, et al.
Published: (2021)
by: Kinsman, Timothy, et al.
Published: (2021)
The Impact of Sanctions on GitHub Developers and Activities
by: Fan, Youmei, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Fan, Youmei, et al.
Published: (2024)
Test Code Review in the Era of GitHub Actions: A Replication Study
by: Sun, Hui, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Sun, Hui, et al.
Published: (2026)
AIDev: Studying AI Coding Agents on GitHub
by: Li, Hao, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Li, Hao, et al.
Published: (2026)
Information-Theoretic Detection of Unusual Source Code Changes
by: Torres, Adriano, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Torres, Adriano, et al.
Published: (2025)
Agentic Much? Adoption of Coding Agents on GitHub
by: Robbes, Romain, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Robbes, Romain, et al.
Published: (2026)
Immersion in the GitHub Universe: Scaling Coding Agents to Mastery
by: Zhao, Jiale, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Zhao, Jiale, et al.
Published: (2026)
Analyzing developer discussions on EU and US privacy legislation compliance in GitHub repositories
by: Kapitsaki, Georgia M., et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Kapitsaki, Georgia M., et al.
Published: (2025)
GitHub Copilot: the perfect Code compLeeter?
by: Siroš, Ilja, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Siroš, Ilja, et al.
Published: (2024)
Bugdar: AI-Augmented Secure Code Review for GitHub Pull Requests
by: Naulty, John, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Naulty, John, et al.
Published: (2025)
Where Is Self-admitted Code Generated by Large Language Models on GitHub?
by: Yu, Xiao, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Yu, Xiao, et al.
Published: (2024)
Brevity is the Soul of Wit: Condensing Code Changes to Improve Commit Message Generation
by: Kuang, Hongyu, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Kuang, Hongyu, et al.
Published: (2025)
Is GitHub's Copilot as Bad as Humans at Introducing Vulnerabilities in Code?
by: Asare, Owura, et al.
Published: (2022)
by: Asare, Owura, et al.
Published: (2022)
Uncovering Code Insights: Leveraging GitHub Artifacts for Deeper Code Understanding
by: Nevo, Ziv, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Nevo, Ziv, et al.
Published: (2025)
On the Use of Agentic Coding: An Empirical Study of Pull Requests on GitHub
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Watanabe, Miku, et al.
Published: (2025)
An Empirical Study of the Evolution of GitHub Actions Workflows
by: Mazrae, Pooya Rostami, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Mazrae, Pooya Rostami, et al.
Published: (2026)
Exploring the Effect of Multiple Natural Languages on Code Suggestion Using GitHub Copilot
by: Koyanagi, Kei, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Koyanagi, Kei, et al.
Published: (2024)
GitBug-Actions: Building Reproducible Bug-Fix Benchmarks with GitHub Actions
by: Saavedra, Nuno, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Saavedra, Nuno, et al.
Published: (2023)
GitHub's Copilot Code Review: Can AI Spot Security Flaws Before You Commit?
by: Amro, Amena, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Amro, Amena, et al.
Published: (2025)
Not One to Rule Them All: Mining Meaningful Code Review Orders From GitHub
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Bouraffa, Abir, et al.
Published: (2025)
GitHub Proxy Server: A tool for supporting massive data collection on GitHub
by: Borges, Hudson Silva, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Borges, Hudson Silva, et al.
Published: (2025)
"An Endless Stream of AI Slop": The Growing Burden of AI-Assisted Software Development
by: Baltes, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Baltes, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2026)
AI Slop and the Software Commons
by: Baltes, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Baltes, Sebastian, et al.
Published: (2026)
Unpacking Security Scanners for GitHub Actions Workflows
by: Fares, Madjda, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Fares, Madjda, et al.
Published: (2026)
On the GitHub Actions Language: Usage, Evolution, and Workflow Reliability
by: Bardsiri, Aref Talebzadeh, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Bardsiri, Aref Talebzadeh, et al.
Published: (2026)
Programming with AI: Evaluating ChatGPT, Gemini, AlphaCode, and GitHub Copilot for Programmers
by: Siam, Md Kamrul, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Siam, Md Kamrul, et al.
Published: (2024)
Measuring the Runtime Performance of C++ Code Written by Humans using GitHub Copilot
by: Erhabor, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Erhabor, Daniel, et al.
Published: (2023)
Security Weaknesses of Copilot-Generated Code in GitHub Projects: An Empirical Study
by: Fu, Yujia, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Fu, Yujia, et al.
Published: (2023)
Nigerian Software Engineer or American Data Scientist? GitHub Profile Recruitment Bias in Large Language Models
by: Nakano, Takashi, et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Nakano, Takashi, et al.
Published: (2024)
Guidelines for Developing Bots for GitHub
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022)
An Empirical Study of Complexity, Heterogeneity, and Compliance of GitHub Actions Workflows
by: Abrokwah, Edward, et al.
Published: (2025)
by: Abrokwah, Edward, et al.
Published: (2025)
Automatic Categorization of GitHub Actions with Transformers and Few-shot Learning
by: Nguyen, Phuong T., et al.
Published: (2024)
by: Nguyen, Phuong T., et al.
Published: (2024)
Configuring Agentic AI Coding Tools: An Exploratory Study
by: Galster, Matthias, et al.
Published: (2026)
by: Galster, Matthias, et al.
Published: (2026)
Can GitHub Issues Help in App Review Classifications?
by: Abedini, Yasaman, et al.
Published: (2023)
by: Abedini, Yasaman, et al.
Published: (2023)
Similar Items
-
Automated Code Review Assignments: An Alternative Perspective of Code Ownership on GitHub
by: Lulla, Jai Lal, et al.
Published: (2025) -
Prioritising GitHub Priority Labels
by: Caddy, James, et al.
Published: (2024) -
GitHub Actions: The Impact on the Pull Request Process
by: Wessel, Mairieli, et al.
Published: (2022) -
Improving LLM-Based Go Code Review through Issue-List Generation and Context Augmentation
by: Sun, Kexin, et al.
Published: (2026) -
"My GitHub Sponsors profile is live!" Investigating the Impact of Twitter/X Mentions on GitHub Sponsors
by: Fan, Youmei, et al.
Published: (2024)